Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ruiji Yu
dblp:372/1320
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
feature separation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
separation loss · 0.9fine-tuning with auxiliary OOD data · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution DetectionabstractIn the open world, detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) data, whose labels are disjoint with those of in-distribution (ID) samples, is important for reliable deep neural networks (DNNs). To achieve better detection performance, one type of approach proposes to fine-tune the model with auxiliary OOD datasets to amplify the difference between ID and OOD data through a separation loss defined on model outputs. However, none of these studies consider enlarging the feature disparity, which should be more effective compared to outputs. The main difficulty lies in the diversity of OOD samples, which makes it hard to describe their feature distribution, let alone design losses to separate them from ID features. In this paper, we neatly fence off the problem based on an aggregation property of ID features named Neural Collapse (NC). NC means that the penultimate features of ID samples within a class are nearly identical to the last layer weight of the corresponding class. Based on this property, we propose a simple but effective loss called Separation Loss, which binds the features of OOD data in a subspace orthogonal to the principal subspace of ID features formed by NC. In this way, the features of ID and OOD samples are separated by different dimensions. By optimizing the feature separation loss rather than purely enlarging output differences, our detection achieves SOTA performance on CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet benchmarks without any additional data augmentation or sampling, demonstrating the importance of feature separation in OOD detection. Code is available
at https://github.com/Wuyingwen/Pursuing-Feature-Separation-for-OOD-Detection. Yingwen Wu, Ruiji Yu, Xinwen Cheng, Zhengbao He, Xiaolin Huang |
ICLR | 2 |