Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ruiji Yu

dblp:372/1320 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 75% Deep learning architectures and training · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
feature separation
0.912025
Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse
0.912025
Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.912025
Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

separation loss · 0.9fine-tuning with auxiliary OOD data · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Pursuing Feature Separation based on Neural Collapse for Out-of-Distribution Detection
abstract
In the open world, detecting out-of-distribution (OOD) data, whose labels are disjoint with those of in-distribution (ID) samples, is important for reliable deep neural networks (DNNs). To achieve better detection performance, one type of approach proposes to fine-tune the model with auxiliary OOD datasets to amplify the difference between ID and OOD data through a separation loss defined on model outputs. However, none of these studies consider enlarging the feature disparity, which should be more effective compared to outputs. The main difficulty lies in the diversity of OOD samples, which makes it hard to describe their feature distribution, let alone design losses to separate them from ID features. In this paper, we neatly fence off the problem based on an aggregation property of ID features named Neural Collapse (NC). NC means that the penultimate features of ID samples within a class are nearly identical to the last layer weight of the corresponding class. Based on this property, we propose a simple but effective loss called Separation Loss, which binds the features of OOD data in a subspace orthogonal to the principal subspace of ID features formed by NC. In this way, the features of ID and OOD samples are separated by different dimensions. By optimizing the feature separation loss rather than purely enlarging output differences, our detection achieves SOTA performance on CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and ImageNet benchmarks without any additional data augmentation or sampling, demonstrating the importance of feature separation in OOD detection. Code is available at https://github.com/Wuyingwen/Pursuing-Feature-Separation-for-OOD-Detection.
Yingwen Wu, Ruiji Yu, Xinwen Cheng, Zhengbao He, Xiaolin Huang
ICLR2