Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chunling Xi
dblp:372/1636
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-9776-5513ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration retrieval |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision · SIGIR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision · SIGIR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision · SIGIR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thought retrieval · 0.8step-level demonstration selection · 0.8aligned decision · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned DecisionabstractSeveral large language model (LLM) agents have been constructed for diverse purposes such as web navigation and online shopping, leveraging the broad knowledge and text comprehension capabilities of LLMs. Many of these works rely on in-context examples to achieve generalization without requiring fine-tuning. However, few have addressed the challenge of selecting and effectively utilizing these examples. Recent approaches have introduced trajectory-level retrieval with task meta-data and the use of trajectories as in-context examples to enhance overall performance in some sequential decision making tasks like computer control. Nevertheless, these methods face issues like plausible examples retrieved without task-specific state transition dynamics and long input with plenty of irrelevant context due to using complete trajectories. In this paper, we propose a novel framework (TRAD) to tackle these problems. TRAD first employs Thought Retrieval for step-level demonstration selection through thought matching, enhancing the quality of demonstrations and reducing irrelevant input noise. Then, Aligned Decision is introduced to complement retrieved demonstration steps with their preceding or subsequent steps, providing tolerance for imperfect thought and offering a balance between more context and less noise. Extensive experiments on ALFWorld and Mind2Web benchmarks demonstrate that TRAD not only surpasses state-of-the-art models but also effectively reduces noise and promotes generalization. Furthermore, TRAD has been deployed in real-world scenarios of a global business insurance company and yields an improved success rate of robotic process automation. Our codes are available at: https://github.com/skyriver-2000/TRAD-Official. Ruiwen Zhou, Yingxuan Yang, Muning Wen, Ying Wen 0001, Chunling Xi, Yong Yu 0001, Weinan Zhang 0001 |
SIGIR | 6 |