Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chunling Xi

dblp:372/1636 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-9776-5513ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › in-context learning
demonstration retrieval
0.812024
TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision · SIGIR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision · SIGIR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.812024
TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision · SIGIR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

thought retrieval · 0.8step-level demonstration selection · 0.8aligned decision · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 TRAD: Enhancing LLM Agents with Step-Wise Thought Retrieval and Aligned Decision
abstract
Several large language model (LLM) agents have been constructed for diverse purposes such as web navigation and online shopping, leveraging the broad knowledge and text comprehension capabilities of LLMs. Many of these works rely on in-context examples to achieve generalization without requiring fine-tuning. However, few have addressed the challenge of selecting and effectively utilizing these examples. Recent approaches have introduced trajectory-level retrieval with task meta-data and the use of trajectories as in-context examples to enhance overall performance in some sequential decision making tasks like computer control. Nevertheless, these methods face issues like plausible examples retrieved without task-specific state transition dynamics and long input with plenty of irrelevant context due to using complete trajectories. In this paper, we propose a novel framework (TRAD) to tackle these problems. TRAD first employs Thought Retrieval for step-level demonstration selection through thought matching, enhancing the quality of demonstrations and reducing irrelevant input noise. Then, Aligned Decision is introduced to complement retrieved demonstration steps with their preceding or subsequent steps, providing tolerance for imperfect thought and offering a balance between more context and less noise. Extensive experiments on ALFWorld and Mind2Web benchmarks demonstrate that TRAD not only surpasses state-of-the-art models but also effectively reduces noise and promotes generalization. Furthermore, TRAD has been deployed in real-world scenarios of a global business insurance company and yields an improved success rate of robotic process automation. Our codes are available at: https://github.com/skyriver-2000/TRAD-Official.
Ruiwen Zhou, Yingxuan Yang, Muning Wen, Ying Wen 0001, Chunling Xi, Yong Yu 0001, Weinan Zhang 0001
SIGIR6