Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Prarabdh Shukla
dblp:372/1855
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 50% Web and mobile security · 50% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security
content moderation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Silencing Empowerment, Allowing Bigotry: Auditing the Moderation of Hate Speech on Twitch · ACL (1) 2025 |
Web and mobile security › harmful content detection
hate speech detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Silencing Empowerment, Allowing Bigotry: Auditing the Moderation of Hate Speech on Twitch · ACL (1) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
audit study · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Silencing Empowerment, Allowing Bigotry: Auditing the Moderation of Hate Speech on TwitchabstractTo meet the demands of content moderation, online platforms have resorted to automated systems. Newer forms of real-time engagement (\textit{e.g.}, users commenting on live streams) on platforms like Twitch exert additional pressures on the latency expected of such moderation systems. Despite their prevalence, relatively little is known about the effectiveness of these systems. In this paper, we conduct an audit of Twitch’s automated moderation tool (\texttt{AutoMod}) to investigate its effectiveness in flagging hateful content. For our audit, we create streaming accounts to act as siloed test beds, and interface with the live chat using Twitch’s APIs to send over 107,000 comments collated from 4 datasets. We measure \texttt{AutoMod}‘s accuracy in flagging blatantly hateful content containing misogyny, racism, ableism and homophobia. Our experiments reveal that a large fraction of hateful messages, up to 94% on some datasets, \text{\textit{bypass moderation}}. Contextual addition of slurs to these messages results in 100% removal, revealing \texttt{AutoMod}‘s reliance on slurs as a hate signal. We also find that contrary to Twitch’s community guidelines, \texttt{AutoMod} blocks up to 89.5% of benign examples that use sensitive words in pedagogical or empowering contexts. Overall, our audit points to large gaps in \texttt{AutoMod}‘s capabilities and underscores the importance for such systems to understand context effectively. Prarabdh Shukla, Wei Yin Chong, Brennan Schaffner, Danish Pruthi, Arjun Nitin Bhagoji |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | DiffRed: Dimensionality reduction guided by stable rankabstractIn this work, we propose a novel dimensionality reduction technique, \textit{DiffRed}, which first projects the data matrix, A, along first $k_1$ principal components and the residual matrix $A^{*}$ (left after subtracting its $k_1$-rank approximation) along $k_2$ Gaussian random vectors. We evaluate \emph{M1}, the distortion of mean-squared pair-wise distance, and \emph{Stress}, the normalized value of RMS of distortion of the pairwise distances. We rigorously prove that \textit{DiffRed} achieves a general upper bound of $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{1-p}{k_2}}\right)$ on \emph{Stress} and $O\left(\frac{1-p}{\sqrt{k_2*\rho(A^{*})}}\right)$ on \emph{M1} where $p$ is the fraction of variance explained by the first $k_1$ principal components and $\rho(A^{*})$ is the \textit{stable rank} of $A^{*}$. These bounds are tighter than the currently known results for Random maps. Our extensive experiments on a variety of real-world datasets demonstrate that \textit{DiffRed} achieves near zero \emph{M1} and much lower values of \emph{Stress} as compared to the well-known dimensionality reduction techniques. In particular, \textit{DiffRed} can map a 6 million dimensional dataset to 10 dimensions with 54% lower \emph{Stress} than PCA. Prarabdh Shukla, Kunal Dutta |
AISTATS | 1 |