Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qianpei He
dblp:372/1873
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Face, body and person analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial attribute analysis
facial attribute recognition |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributionally Generative Augmentation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair classification
fair facial attribute classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributionally Generative Augmentation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Distributionally Generative Augmentation for Fair Facial Attribute Classification · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
generative augmentation · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Distributionally Generative Augmentation for Fair Facial Attribute ClassificationabstractFacial Attribute Classification (FAC) holds substantial promise in widespread applications. However, FAC models trained by traditional methodologies can be unfair by exhibiting accuracy inconsistencies across varied data sub-populations. This unfairness is largely attributed to bias in data, where some spurious attributes (e.g., Male) statistically correlate with the target attribute (e.g., Smiling). Most of existing fairness-aware methods rely on the labels of spurious attributes, which may be unavailable in practice. This work proposes a novel, generation-based two-stage framework to train a fair FAC model on biased data without additional annotation. Initially, we identify the potential spurious attributes based on generative models. Notably, it enhances interpretability by explicitly showing the spurious attributes in image space. Following this, for each image, we first edit the spurious attributes with a random degree sampled from a uniform distribution, while keeping target attribute unchanged. Then we train a fair FAC model by fostering model invariance to these augmentation. Extensive experiments on three common datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in promoting fairness in FAC without compromising accuracy. Codes are in https://github.com/heqianpei/DiGA. Fengda Zhang, Qianpei He, Kun Kuang 0001, Long Chen 0016, Chao Wu 0001, Jun Xiao 0001, Hanwang Zhang |
CVPR | 2 |