EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Mataigne
dblp:372/3038
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
group equivariant neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Selective G-Bispectrum and its Inversion: Applications to G-Invariant Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
invariant representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | The Selective G-Bispectrum and its Inversion: Applications to G-Invariant Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
signal processing · 0.8group theory · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | The Selective G-Bispectrum and its Inversion: Applications to G-Invariant NetworksabstractAn important problem in signal processing and deep learning is to achieve *invariance* to nuisance factors not relevant for the task. Since many of these factors are describable as the action of a group $G$ (e.g. rotations, translations, scalings), we want methods to be $G$-invariant. The $G$-Bispectrum extracts every characteristic of a given signal up to group action: for example, the shape of an object in an image, but not its orientation. Consequently, the $G$-Bispectrum has been incorporated into deep neural network architectures as a computational primitive for $G$-invariance\textemdash akin to a pooling mechanism, but with greater selectivity and robustness. However, the computational cost of the $G$-Bispectrum ($\mathcal{O}(|G|^2)$, with $|G|$ the size of the group) has limited its widespread adoption. Here, we show that the $G$-Bispectrum computation contains redundancies that can be reduced into a *selective $G$-Bispectrum* with $\mathcal{O}(|G|)$ complexity. We prove desirable mathematical properties of the selective $G$-Bispectrum and demonstrate how its integration in neural networks enhances accuracy and robustness compared to traditional approaches, while enjoying considerable speeds-up compared to the full $G$-Bispectrum. Simon Mataigne, Johan Mathe, Sophia Sanborn, Christopher Hillar, Nina Miolane |
NeurIPS | 1 |