Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Montek Kalsi

dblp:372/3462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 50% Human-AI interaction · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 77% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › GUI agent
computer use agents
0.912025
UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interaction · ICML 2025
Interaction techniques and input
GUI interaction
0.912025
UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interaction · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
spatial reasoning
0.312025
UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interaction · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 UI-Vision: A Desktop-centric GUI Benchmark for Visual Perception and Interaction
abstract
Autonomous agents that navigate Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs) to automate tasks like document editing and file management can greatly enhance computer workflows. While existing research focuses on online settings, desktop environments, critical for many professional and everyday tasks, remain underexplored due to data collection challenges and licensing issues. We introduce UI-Vision, the first comprehensive, license-permissive benchmark for offline, fine-grained evaluation of computer use agents in real-world desktop environments. Unlike online benchmarks, UI-Vision provides: (i) dense, high-quality annotations of human demonstrations, including bounding boxes, UI labels, and action trajectories (clicks, drags, and keyboard inputs) across 83 software applications, and (ii) three fine-to-coarse grained tasks—Element Grounding, Layout Grounding, and Action Prediction—with well-defined metrics to rigorously evaluate agents’ performance in desktop environments. Our evaluation reveals critical limitations in state-of-the-art models like UI-TARS-72B, including issues with understanding professional software, spatial reasoning, and complex actions like drag-and-drop. These findings highlight the challenges in developing fully autonomous computer-use agents. With UI-Vision, we aim to advance the development of more capable agents for real-world desktop tasks.
Shravan Nayak, Xiangru Jian, Qinghong Lin, Juan A. Rodríguez, Montek Kalsi, Nicolas Chapados, M. Tamer Özsu, Aishwarya Agrawal, David Vázquez 0001, Christopher Joseph Pal, Perouz Taslakian, Spandana Gella, Sai Rajeswar
ICML5