Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akihiro Oga

dblp:372/7444 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › experimental design
adaptive experimental design
0.812024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
experimental design
0.812024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation
0.812024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.812024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024
Mathematical optimization › causal inference
treatment effect estimation
0.812024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
average treatment effect estimation
0.212024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.212024
Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semiparametric efficiency bound · 1.5propensity score optimization · 1.5covariate density optimization · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Active Adaptive Experimental Design for Treatment Effect Estimation with Covariate Choice
abstract
This study designs an adaptive experiment for efficiently estimating *average treatment effects* (ATEs). In each round of our adaptive experiment, an experimenter sequentially samples an experimental unit, assigns a treatment, and observes the corresponding outcome immediately. At the end of the experiment, the experimenter estimates an ATE using the gathered samples. The objective is to estimate the ATE with a smaller asymptotic variance. Existing studies have designed experiments that adaptively optimize the propensity score (treatment-assignment probability). As a generalization of such an approach, we propose optimizing the covariate density as well as the propensity score. First, we derive the efficient covariate density and propensity score that minimize the semiparametric efficiency bound and find that optimizing both covariate density and propensity score minimizes the semiparametric efficiency bound more effectively than optimizing only the propensity score. Next, we design an adaptive experiment using the efficient covariate density and propensity score sequentially estimated during the experiment. Lastly, we propose an ATE estimator whose asymptotic variance aligns with the minimized semiparametric efficiency bound.
Masahiro Kato, Akihiro Oga, Wataru Komatsubara, Ryo Inokuchi
ICML2