Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brydon P. G. Wall

dblp:372/7547 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
functional genomics
1.012026
Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
1.012026
Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data processing
1.012026
Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches · Bioinform. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sponge sequences · 1.0read alignment · 1.0blacklist exclusion sets · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Beyond blacklists: a critical assessment of exclusion set generation strategies and alternative approaches
abstract
MOTIVATION: Short-read sequencing data can be affected by alignment artifacts in certain genomic regions. Removing reads overlapping these exclusion regions, previously known as Blacklists, help to potentially improve biological signal. Alternatively, "sponge" or decoy sequences have been proposed to reduce alignment artifacts. RESULTS: We examined the widely used Blacklist software and found that pre-generated exclusion sets were difficult to reproduce due to sensitivity to input data, aligner choice, and read length. We further explored the use of "sponge" sequences-unassembled genomic regions such as satellite DNA, ribosomal DNA, and mitochondrial DNA-as an alternative approach. We additionally investigated the effect of the T2T-CHM13 genome assembly on improving biological signals. Aligning reads to a genome that includes sponge sequences reduced signal correlation in ChIP-seq data comparably to Blacklist-derived exclusion sets while preserving biological signal. Sponge-based alignment also had minimal impact on RNA-seq gene counts, suggesting broader applicability beyond chromatin profiling. These results highlight the limitations of fixed exclusion sets, and recommend the use of the T2T-CHM13 assembly or, for the hg38 genome assembly, "sponge" sequences as an alignment-guided strategy for reducing artifacts and improving functional genomics analyses.
Brydon P. G. Wall, Jonathan D. Ogata, My Nguyen, Amy L. Olex, Konstantinos V. Floros, Anthony C. Faber, Joseph L. McClay, J. Chuck Harrell, Mikhail G. Dozmorov
Bioinform.1