Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David C. Y. Chu

dblp:373/2161 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-9922-1994ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Memory systems · 56% Distributed systems · 44%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 74% Query processing and optimization · 26%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed protocols
0.812024
Optimizing Distributed Protocols with Query Rewrites · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Memory systems
protocol optimization
0.812024
Optimizing Distributed Protocols with Query Rewrites · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Query processing and optimization
query rewriting
0.212024
Optimizing Distributed Protocols with Query Rewrites · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Memory systems
cache management
0.212023
Take Out the TraChe: Maximizing (Tra)nsactional Ca(che) Hit Rate · OSDI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

order-insensitivity analysis · 1.5data dependency analysis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Optimizing Distributed Protocols with Query Rewrites
abstract
Distributed protocols such as 2PC and Paxos lie at the core of many systems in the cloud, but standard implementations do not scale. New scalable distributed protocols are developed through careful analysis and rewrites, but this process is ad hoc and error-prone. This paper presents an approach for scaling any distributed protocol by applying rule-driven rewrites, borrowing from query optimization. Distributed protocol rewrites entail a new burden: reasoning about spatiotemporal correctness. We leverage order-insensitivity and data dependency analysis to systematically identify correct coordination-free scaling opportunities. We apply this analysis to create preconditions and mechanisms for coordination-free decoupling and partitioning, two fundamental vertical and horizontal scaling techniques. Manual rule-driven applications of decoupling and partitioning improve the throughput of 2PC by 5× and Paxos by 3×, and match state-of-the-art throughput in recent work. These results point the way toward automated optimizers for distributed protocols based on correct-by-construction rewrite rules.
David C. Y. Chu, Rithvik Panchapakesan, Shadaj Laddad, Lucky Katahanas, Chris Liu, Kaushik Shivakumar, Natacha Crooks, Joseph M. Hellerstein, Heidi Howard
Proc. ACM Manag. Data1
2023 Take Out the TraChe: Maximizing (Tra)nsactional Ca(che) Hit Rate
Audrey Cheng, David C. Y. Chu, Terrance Li, Natacha Crooks, Joseph M. Hellerstein, Ion Stoica, Xiangyao Yu
OSDI2
2020 Reliable, Efficient Recovery for Complex Services with Replicated Subsystems
abstract
Applications with internal substructure are common in the cloud, where many systems are organized as independently logged and replicated subsystems that interact via flows of objects or some form of RPC. Restarting such an application is difficult: a restart algorithm needs to efficiently provision the subsystems by mapping them to nodes with needed data and compute resources, while simultaneously guaranteeing that replicas are in distinct failure domains. Additional failures can occur during recovery, hence the restart process must itself be a restartable procedure. In this paper we present an algorithm for efficiently restarting a service composed of sharded subsystems, each using a replicated state machine model, into a state that (1) has the same fault-tolerance guarantees as the running system, (2) satisfies resource constraints and has all needed data to restart into a consistent state, (3) makes safe decisions about which updates to preserve from the logged state, (4) ensures that the restarted state will be mutually consistent across all subsystems and shards, and (5) ensures that no committed updates will be lost. If restart is not currently possible, the algorithm will await additional resources, then retry.
Edward Tremel, Sagar Jha, Weijia Song, David C. Y. Chu, Kenneth P. Birman
DSN4