Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Juheun Lee

dblp:373/2469 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator
0.812024
FIGNA: Integer Unit-Based Accelerator Design for FP-INT GEMM Preserving Numerical Accuracy · HPCA 2024
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › neural network accelerator
quantized neural network accelerator
0.812024
FIGNA: Integer Unit-Based Accelerator Design for FP-INT GEMM Preserving Numerical Accuracy · HPCA 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization
0.212024
FIGNA: Integer Unit-Based Accelerator Design for FP-INT GEMM Preserving Numerical Accuracy · HPCA 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › weight quantization
weight-only quantization
0.212024
FIGNA: Integer Unit-Based Accelerator Design for FP-INT GEMM Preserving Numerical Accuracy · HPCA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantization · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 MECA-CiM: A Shared-MicroExponent-aware Configurable Analog Compute-in-Memory Macro for Efficient Inference
Wonkyung Han, Juheun Lee, Sukhyun Choi, Wonjun Han, Jae-Joon Kim
ISLPED4
2024 FIGNA: Integer Unit-Based Accelerator Design for FP-INT GEMM Preserving Numerical Accuracy
abstract
The weight-only quantization has emerged as a promising technique for alleviating the computational burden of large language models (LLMs) by employing low-precision integer (INT) weights, while retaining full-precision floating point (FP) activations to ensure inference quality. Despite the memory footprint reduction achieved through decreased bit-precision of weight parameters, the actual computing performance is often not improved significantly due to FP-INT multiply-accumulation (MAC) operations being performed on the floating point unit (FPU) after de quantizing the INT weight values to FP values, owing to the lack of dedicated FP- INT arithmetic units. In this study, we investigate the impact of introducing a dedicated FP-INT unit on overall performance and find that such specialization does not yield substantial improvements. As an alternative approach, we propose FIGNA, an accelerator based on INT units designed specifically for FP- INT MAC operations. A key feature of FIGNA is its ability to achieve the same numerical accuracy as the FPU while relying solely on the integer-unit, a departure from prior methods that relied on integer-units with numerical approximations for FP arithmetic results, albeit claiming similar inference accuracy through dedicated network training. Through comprehensive experiments on FP- INT quantized networks for LLMs, including OPT and BLOOM, we demonstrate the superior performance of FIGNA compared to conventional FPUs in terms of performance per area ($TOPS/mm^{2}$) and energy efficiency (TOPS/W) across various input and weight precision combinations. For instance, in the FP16-INT4 case, FIGNA shows 6.34x higher$TOPS/ mm^{2}$and 2.19x higher TOPS/W compared to the baseline.
Jaeyong Jang, Yulhwa Kim, Juheun Lee, Jae-Joon Kim
HPCA3