In datacenters, common incast traffic patterns are challenging because they violate the basic premise of bandwidth stability on which TCP congestion control convergence is built, overwhelming shallow switch buffers and causing packet losses and high latency. To understand why these challenges remain despite decades of research on datacenter congestion control, we conduct an in-depth investigation into high-degree incasts both in production workloads at Meta and in simulation. In addition to characterizing the bursty nature of these incasts and their impacts on the network, our findings demonstrate the shortcomings of widely deployed window-based congestion control techniques used to address incast problems. Furthermore, we find that hosts associated with a specific application or service exhibit similar and predictable incast traffic properties across hours, pointing the way toward solutions that predict and prevent incast bursts, instead of reacting to them.

Managing the performance of thousands of services across millions of servers demands a networking stack that can dynamically adjust protocol settings to match diverse priorities and network characteristics. Moreover, given the constantly evolving nature of services and their requirements, the set of configurable protocols must remain adaptable. However, current host networking stacks lack the necessary flexibility and adaptability. Although eBPF shows promise in this regard, it lacks essential primitives for efficient development and safe deployment of multiple co-existing services.