EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiaolian Zhu
dblp:374/3502
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-4488-5624ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Immersive interaction · 56% Collaborative and social computing · 44% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Immersive interaction
virtual reality training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Tai Chi Training System: Towards Group-Based and Hyper-Realistic Training Experiences · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024 |
Immersive interaction
mixed reality interaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Enhancing Tai Chi Training System: Towards Group-Based and Hyper-Realistic Training Experiences · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.8motion guidance trajectories · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Enhancing Tai Chi Training System: Towards Group-Based and Hyper-Realistic Training ExperiencesabstractIn this article, we propose a lightweight and flexible enhanced Tai Chi training system composed of multiple standalone virtual reality (VR) devices. The system aims to enable a hyper-realistic multi-user action training platform at low cost by displaying real-time action guidance trajectories, providing real-world impossible visual effects and functions, and rapidly enhancing movement precision and communication interest for learners. We objectively evaluate participants' action quality at different levels of immersion, including traditional coach guidance (TCG), VR, and mixed reality (MR), along with subjective measures like motion sickness, quality of interaction, social meaning, presence/immersion to comprehensively explore the system's feasibility. The results indicate VR performs the best in training accuracy, but MR provides superior social experience and relatively high accuracy. Unlike TCG, MR offers hyper-realistic hand movement trajectories and Tai Chi social references. Compared with VR, MR provides more realistic avatar companions and a safer environment. In summary, MR balances accuracy and social experience. Shuting Ni, Qiaolian Zhu, Chunyi Xu, Yuzhi Li |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 5 |