Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vladimir Solodkin
dblp:374/7998
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | WeightLoRA: Keep Only Necessary Adapters · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | WeightLoRA: Keep Only Necessary Adapters · ACL (1) 2026 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
mirror descent |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Methods for Optimization Problems with Markovian Stochasticity and Non-Euclidean Geometry · AAAI 2026 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Methods for Optimization Problems with Markovian Stochasticity and Non-Euclidean Geometry · AAAI 2026 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
variational inequality |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Methods for Optimization Problems with Markovian Stochasticity and Non-Euclidean Geometry · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | WeightLoRA: Keep Only Necessary Adapters · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
non-euclidean geometry · 1.0mirror descent · 1.0markov noise · 1.0convergence analysis · 1.0LoRA · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Methods for Optimization Problems with Markovian Stochasticity and Non-Euclidean GeometryabstractThis paper examines a variety of classical optimization problems, including well-known minimization tasks and more general variational inequalities. We consider a stochastic formulation of these problems and, unlike most previous work, we take into account the complex Markov nature of the noise. We also consider the geometry of the problem in an arbitrary non-Euclidean setting and propose four methods based on the Mirror Descent iteration technique. The theoretical analysis is provided for smooth and convex minimization problems and variational inequalities with Lipschitz and monotone operators. The convergence guarantees obtained are optimal for first-order stochastic methods, as evidenced by the lower bound estimates provided in this paper. In order to validate the theoretical results, we present the relevant numerical experiments on various reinforcement learning tasks. Vladimir Solodkin, Andrey Veprikov, Alexander Chernyavskiy, Aleksandr Beznosikov |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2026 | WeightLoRA: Keep Only Necessary AdaptersabstractAndrey Veprikov, Vladimir Solodkin, Zyl Alexander, Andrey Savchenko, Aleksandr Beznosikov. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Andrey Veprikov, Vladimir Solodkin, Alexander Zyl, Andrey V. Savchenko, Aleksandr Beznosikov |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2024 | Stochastic Frank-Wolfe: Unified Analysis and Zoo of Special CasesabstractThe Conditional Gradient (or Frank-Wolfe) method is one of the most well-known methods for solving constrained optimization problems appearing in various machine learning tasks. The simplicity of iteration and applicability to many practical problems helped the method to gain popularity in the community. In recent years, the Frank-Wolfe algorithm received many different extensions, including stochastic modifications with variance reduction and coordinate sampling for training of huge models or distributed variants for big data problems. In this paper, we present a unified convergence analysis of the Stochastic Frank-Wolfe method that covers a large number of particular practical cases that may have completely different nature of stochasticity, intuitions and application areas. Our analysis is based on a key parametric assumption on the variance of the stochastic gradients. But unlike most works on unified analysis of other methods, such as SGD, we do not assume an unbiasedness of the real gradient estimation. We conduct analysis for convex and non-convex problems due to the popularity of both cases in machine learning. With this general theoretical framework, we not only cover rates of many known methods, but also develop numerous new methods. This shows the flexibility of our approach in developing new algorithms based on the Conditional Gradient approach. We also demonstrate the properties of the new methods through numerical experiments. Ruslan Nazykov, Aleksandr Shestakov, Vladimir Solodkin, Aleksandr Beznosikov, Gauthier Gidel, Alexander V. Gasnikov |
AISTATS | 3 |