Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linsen Liu

dblp:374/8345 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-9128-2291ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
patch management
0.812024
Not as easy as just update: Survey of System Administrators and Patching Behaviours · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Not as easy as just update: Survey of System Administrators and Patching Behaviours
abstract
Patching software theoretically leads to improvements including security critical changes, but it can also lead to new issues. For System Administrators (sysadmins) new issues can negatively impact operations at their organization. While mitigation options like test environments exist, little is known about their prevalence or how contextual factors like size of organization impact the practice of Patch Management. We surveyed 220 sysadmins engaged in Patch Management to investigate self-reported behaviors. We found that dedicated testing environments are not as prevalent as previously assumed. We also expand on known behaviours that sysadmins perform when facing a troublesome patch, such as employing a range of problem solving behaviours to inform their patching decisions.
Adam D. G. Jenkins, Linsen Liu, Maria Klara Wolters, Kami Vaniea
CHI2