Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chanin Eom

dblp:374/8462 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-6340-6635ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 70% Autonomous driving · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving
autonomous driving benchmark
0.812024
AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
decision-making for autonomous driving
0.812024
AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.812024
AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset · ICRA 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value-based reinforcement learning
0.212024
AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

offline reinforcement learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Price of the Autonomous Strategy With Reinforcement Learning in Mixed-Autonomy Traffic Networks
abstract
With the increasing focus on research on autonomous driving, road environments have evolved into mixed-autonomy traffic networks. In this context, developing an autonomous strategy that can reduce societal costs is important because autonomous vehicles have a direct impact on the entire traffic network. Deep reinforcement learning (RL), a promising autonomous decision-making process, typically leads to anegocentric strategycharacterized by a static target and disregards rapidly changing traffic conditions. However, this approach can incur significant societal costs in complex traffic scenarios. In this study, we propose afast-follower strategythat effectively reduces societal costs in a mixed-autonomy traffic network by dynamically adjusting the reward standards to accommodate varying traffic conditions. To assess the impact of autonomous strategies on transportation networks, we introduce a novel metric, theprice of autonomous strategy(PoAS), which is designed to quantify the societal costs associated with autonomous decision-making. Additionally, we provide a traffic-aware analysis using PoAS to identify the driving conditions under which the fast-follower strategy results in a lower societal cost than the egocentric strategy. This theoretical analysis is validated using PoAS comparisons across various societal metrics and traffic conditions. The simulation results confirm that the fast-follower strategy outperforms other autonomous strategies in mixed and fully autonomous traffic networks.
Chanin Eom, Minhae Kwon
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.1
2024 AD4RL: Autonomous Driving Benchmarks for Offline Reinforcement Learning with Value-based Dataset
abstract
Offline reinforcement learning has emerged as a promising technology by enhancing its practicality through the use of pre-collected large datasets. Despite its practical benefits, most algorithm development research in offline reinforcement learning still relies on game tasks with synthetic datasets. To address such limitations, this paper provides autonomous driving datasets and benchmarks for offline reinforcement learning research. We provide 19 datasets, including real-world human driver’s datasets, and seven popular offline reinforcement learning algorithms in three realistic driving scenarios. We also provide a unified decision-making process model that can operate effectively across different scenarios, serving as a reference framework in algorithm design. Our research lays the groundwork for further collaborations in the community to explore practical aspects of existing reinforcement learning methods. Dataset and codes can be found in https://sites.google.com/view/ad4rl.
Dongsu Lee, Chanin Eom, Minhae Kwon
ICRA2