Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuzhou Du

dblp:374/8914 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-7075-4252ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Health and well-being technologies · 33% Human-AI interaction · 32% Learning and educational technologies · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Health and well-being technologies › behavior change
behavior change technology
1.012026
Does Personalized Nudging Wear Off? A Longitudinal Study of AI Self-Modeling for Behavioral Engagement · CHI 2026
Learning and educational technologies
programming education
0.812024
Learning Agent-based Modeling with LLM Companions: Experiences of Novices and Experts Using ChatGPT & NetLogo Chat · CHI 2024
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
longitudinal study
0.312026
Does Personalized Nudging Wear Off? A Longitudinal Study of AI Self-Modeling for Behavioral Engagement · CHI 2026
Human-AI interaction
human-AI collaboration
0.212024
Learning Agent-based Modeling with LLM Companions: Experiences of Novices and Experts Using ChatGPT & NetLogo Chat · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interviews · 1.8randomized controlled experiment · 1.0longitudinal study · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Does Personalized Nudging Wear Off? A Longitudinal Study of AI Self-Modeling for Behavioral Engagement
abstract
Sustaining the effectiveness of behavior change technologies remains a key challenge. AI self-modeling, which generates personalized portrayals of one’s ideal self, has shown promise for motivating behavior change, yet prior work largely examines short-term effects. We present one of the first longitudinal evaluations of AI self-modeling in fitness engagement through a two-stage empirical study. A 1-week, three-arm experiment (visual self-modeling (VSM), auditory self-modeling (ASM), Control; N=28) revealed that VSM drove initial performance gains, while ASM showed no significant effects. A subsequent 4-week study (VSM vs. Control; N=31) demonstrated that VSM sustained higher performance levels but exhibited diminishing improvement rates after two weeks. Interviews uncovered a catalyst effect that fostered early motivation through clear, attainable goals, followed by habituation and internalization which stabilized performance. These findings highlight the temporal dynamics of personalized nudging and inform the design of behavior change technologies for long-term engagement.
Yuzhou Du, Jiahuan Ding, Yuanchun Shi, Yuntao Wang 0001
CHI3
2024 Learning Agent-based Modeling with LLM Companions: Experiences of Novices and Experts Using ChatGPT & NetLogo Chat
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to fundamentally change the way people engage in computer programming. Agent-based modeling (ABM) has become ubiquitous in natural and social sciences and education, yet no prior studies have explored the potential of LLMs to assist it. We designed NetLogo Chat to support the learning and practice of NetLogo, a programming language for ABM. To understand how users perceive, use, and need LLM-based interfaces, we interviewed 30 participants from global academia, industry, and graduate schools. Experts reported more perceived benefits than novices and were more inclined to adopt LLMs in their workflow. We found significant differences between experts and novices in their perceptions, behaviors, and needs for human-AI collaboration. We surfaced a knowledge gap between experts and novices as a possible reason for the benefit gap. We identified guidance, personalization, and integration as major needs for LLM-based interfaces to support the programming of ABM.
Xi Lu 0002, Yuzhou Du, Michael Rejtig, Ruth Bagley, Michael S. Horn, Uri Wilensky
CHI3