Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cen Yao
dblp:374/8934
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0002-5689-0228ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 44% Collaborative and social computing · 44% Design research and methods · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › social media
filter bubble |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | See Widely, Think Wisely: Toward Designing a Generative Multi-agent System to Burst Filter Bubbles · CHI 2024 |
Human-AI interaction
large language model interaction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | See Widely, Think Wisely: Toward Designing a Generative Multi-agent System to Burst Filter Bubbles · CHI 2024 |
Design research and methods
participatory design |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | See Widely, Think Wisely: Toward Designing a Generative Multi-agent System to Burst Filter Bubbles · CHI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-agent system · 0.8large language model · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | See Widely, Think Wisely: Toward Designing a Generative Multi-agent System to Burst Filter BubblesabstractThe proliferation of AI-powered search and recommendation systems has accelerated the formation of “filter bubbles” that reinforce people’s biases and narrow their perspectives. Previous research has attempted to address this issue by increasing the diversity of information exposure, which is often hindered by a lack of user motivation to engage with. In this study, we took a human-centered approach to explore how Large Language Models (LLMs) could assist users in embracing more diverse perspectives. We developed a prototype featuring LLM-powered multi-agent characters that users could interact with while reading social media content. We conducted a participatory design study with 18 participants and found that multi-agent dialogues with gamification incentives could motivate users to engage with opposing viewpoints. Additionally, progressive interactions with assessment tasks could promote thoughtful consideration. Based on these findings, we provided design implications with future work outlooks for leveraging LLMs to help users burst their filter bubbles. Yu Zhang 0124, Jingwei Sun 0005, Cen Yao, Mingming Fan 0001, Liuxin Zhang, Qianying Wang 0002, Xin Geng 0001, Yong Rui |
CHI | 4 |