Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luca Dovichi

dblp:374/9726 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-1343-4115ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Authentication and access control · 52% Usable security · 28% Privacy and data protection · 20%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 77% User interface design and tools · 23%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
password security
1.012026
Can Foundation LLMs Accurately Estimate Password Strength and Provide Appropriate Password Feedback? · SP 2026
Authentication and access control › password security
password strength estimation
1.012026
Can Foundation LLMs Accurately Estimate Password Strength and Provide Appropriate Password Feedback? · SP 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.812024
JupyterLab in Retrograde: Contextual Notifications That Highlight Fairness and Bias Issues for Data Scientists · CHI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data provenance tracing · 1.5between-subjects experiment · 1.5automated code analysis · 1.5foundation LLMs · 1.0user study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Can Foundation LLMs Accurately Estimate Password Strength and Provide Appropriate Password Feedback?
Madison Pickering, Garrison Hinson-Hasty, Luca Dovichi, Helena Williams, Nathaniel Kim, Aybala Esmer, Blase Ur
SP3
2024 JupyterLab in Retrograde: Contextual Notifications That Highlight Fairness and Bias Issues for Data Scientists
abstract
Current algorithmic fairness tools focus on auditing completed models, neglecting the potential downstream impacts of iterative decisions about cleaning data and training machine learning models. In response, we developed Retrograde, a JupyterLab environment extension for Python that generates real-time, contextual notifications for data scientists about decisions they are making regarding protected classes, proxy variables, missing data, and demographic differences in model performance. Our novel framework uses automated code analysis to trace data provenance in JupyterLab, enabling these notifications. In a between-subjects online experiment, 51 data scientists constructed loan-decision models with Retrograde providing notifications continuously throughout the process, only at the end, or never. Retrograde’s notifications successfully nudged participants to account for missing data, avoid using protected classes as predictors, minimize demographic differences in model performance, and exhibit healthy skepticism about their models.
Galen Harrison, Kevin Bryson 0002, Ahmad Emmanuel Balla Bamba, Luca Dovichi, Aleksander Herrmann Binion, Arthur Borem, Blase Ur
CHI4
2024 Data Subjects' Reactions to Exercising Their Right of Access
Arthur Borem, Elleen Pan, Olufunmilola Obielodan, Aurelie Roubinowitz, Luca Dovichi, Michelle L. Mazurek, Blase Ur
USENIX Security Symposium5