Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Tvrtko Tadic

dblp:375/1562 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 50% Learning theory · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding
0.912025
Node Similarities under Random Projections: Limits and Pathological Cases · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
random projection
0.912025
Node Similarities under Random Projections: Limits and Pathological Cases · ICLR 2025
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction
0.912025
Node Similarities under Random Projections: Limits and Pathological Cases · ICLR 2025
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
random projection
0.912025
Node Similarities under Random Projections: Limits and Pathological Cases · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

johnson-lindenstrauss lemma · 1.7dot product similarity · 1.7cosine similarity · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Node Similarities under Random Projections: Limits and Pathological Cases
abstract
Random Projections have been widely used to generate embeddings for various graph learning tasks due to their computational efficiency. The majority of applications have been justified through the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma. In this paper, we take a step further and investigate how well dot product and cosine similarity are preserved by random projections when these are applied over the rows of the graph matrix. Our analysis provides new asymptotic and finite-sample results, identifies pathological cases, and tests them with numerical experiments. We specialize our fundamental results to a ranking application by computing the probability of random projections flipping the node ordering induced by their embeddings. We find that, depending on the degree distribution, the method produces especially unreliable embeddings for the dot product, regardless of whether the adjacency or the normalized transition matrix is used. With respect to the statistical noise introduced by random projections, we show that cosine similarity produces remarkably more precise approximations.
Tvrtko Tadic, Cassiano Becker, Jennifer Neville
ICLR1