Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jungho An
dblp:375/1633
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 37% Reinforcement learning · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2026 | Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 Contextrast: Contextual Contrastive Learning for Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › generalization in reinforcement learning
zero-shot reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
boundary-aware segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Contextrast: Contextual Contrastive Learning for Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
contrastive learning for segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Contextrast: Contextual Contrastive Learning for Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Contextrast: Contextual Contrastive Learning for Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
locomotion |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 1.8representation disentanglement · 1.0multi-scale feature aggregation · 0.8hard negative sampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation for Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning (Student Abstract)abstractOffline Zero-Shot Reinforcement Learning requires an agent to solve unseen tasks using only a fixed offline dataset without explicit rewards. A central challenge is learning representations that capture both high-level long-term planning and low-level physical dynamics. We propose a novel framework, Dynamics-Aware Planning Representation (DAPR), which disentangles these two aspects via complementary contrastive objectives. Specifically, DAPR learns goal-oriented planning directions and local dynamics-consistent directions in the latent space. By jointly enforcing these constraints, DAPR yields representations that balance “where to go” with “how to move.” Experiments on standard locomotion benchmarks (Walker, Cheetah, Quadruped) demonstrate that DAPR consistently improves performance and generalization over strong baselines, achieving substantial gains on precision demanding tasks. Jungho An, Haeun Kim, Dong-Soo Har |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Contextrast: Contextual Contrastive Learning for Semantic SegmentationabstractDespite great improvements in semantic segmentation, challenges persist because of the lack of local/global contexts and the relationship between them. In this paper, we propose Contextrast, a contrastive learning-based semantic segmentation method that allows to capture local/global contexts and comprehend their relationships. Our proposed method comprises two parts: a) contextual contrastive learning (CCL) and b) boundary-aware negative (BANE) sampling. Contextual contrastive learning obtains local/global context from multi-scale feature aggregation and inter/intra-relationship of features for better discrimination capabilities. Meanwhile, BANE sampling selects embedding features along the boundaries of incorrectly predicted regions to employ them as harder negative samples on our contrastive learning, resolving segmentation issues along the boundary region by exploiting fine-grained details. We demonstrate that our Contextrast substantially enhances the performance of semantic segmentation networks, outper-forming state-of-the-art contrastive learning approaches on diverse public datasets, e.g. Cityscapes, CamVid, PASCALC, COCO-Stuff, and ADE20K, without an increase in computational cost during inference. Changki Sung, Wanhee Kim, Jungho An, Wooju Lee, Hyungtae Lim, Hyun Myung |
CVPR | 3 |