Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gonçalo Paulo
dblp:375/1706
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 76% Language models and text generation · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 4% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025 Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › model steering › language model steering
activation steering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature interpretation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language model analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs? · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tuned lens · 0.9sparse autoencoder · 0.9latent knowledge elicitation · 0.9large language model · 0.9intervention scoring · 0.9contrastive activation addition · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Do Transformer Interpretability Methods Transfer to RNNs?abstractRecent advances in recurrent neural network architectures, such as Mamba and RWKV, have enabled RNNs to match or exceed the performance of equal-size transformers in terms of language modeling perplexity and downstream evaluations, suggesting that future systems may be built on completely new architectures. In this paper, we examine if selected interpretability methods originally designed for transformer language models will transfer to these up-and-coming recurrent architectures. Specifically, we focus on steering model outputs via contrastive activation addition, on eliciting latent predictions via the tuned lens, and eliciting latent knowledge from models fine-tuned to produce false outputs under certain conditions. Our results show that most of these techniques are effective when applied to RNNs, and we show that it is possible to improve some of them by taking advantage of RNNs' compressed state. Gonçalo Paulo, Thomas Marshall, Nora Belrose |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Automatically Interpreting Millions of Features in Large Language ModelsabstractWhile the activations of neurons in deep neural networks usually do not have a simple human-understandable interpretation, sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can be used to transform these activations into a higher-dimensional latent space which can be more easily interpretable. However, SAEs can have millions of distinct latents, making it infeasible for humans to manually interpret each one. In this work, we build an open-source automated pipeline to generate and evaluate natural language interpretations for SAE latents using LLMs. We test our framework on SAEs of varying sizes, activation functions, and losses, trained on two different open-weight LLMs. We introduce five new techniques to score the quality of interpretations that are cheaper to run than the previous state of the art. One of these techniques, intervention scoring, evaluates the interpretability of the effects of intervening on a latent, which we find explains latents that are not recalled by existing methods. We propose guidelines for generating better interpretations that remain valid for a broader set of activating contexts, and discuss pitfalls with existing scoring techniques. Our code is available at https://github.com/EleutherAI/delphi. Gonçalo Paulo, Alex Mallen, Caden Juang, Nora Belrose |
ICML | 1 |