Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ian Maksimov

dblp:375/2064 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 52% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Generative modeling · 12%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative flow networks
0.912025
Revisiting Non-Acyclic GFlowNets in Discrete Environments · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
maximum entropy reinforcement learning
0.912025
Revisiting Non-Acyclic GFlowNets in Discrete Environments · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.912025
Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
offline alignment
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization
0.912025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
reward overoptimization
0.312025
Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trust region · 0.9trajectory sampling · 0.9sparse autoencoder · 0.9flow matching · 0.9feature matching · 0.9KTO · 0.9IPO · 0.9DPO · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Mechanistic Permutability: Match Features Across Layers
abstract
Understanding how features evolve across layers in deep neural networks is a fundamental challenge in mechanistic interpretability, particularly due to polysemanticity and feature superposition. While Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) have been used to extract interpretable features from individual layers, aligning these features across layers has remained an open problem. In this paper, we introduce SAE Match, a novel, data-free method for aligning SAE features across different layers of a neural network. Our approach involves matching features by minimizing the mean squared error between the folded parameters of SAEs, a technique that incorporates activation thresholds into the encoder and decoder weights to account for differences in feature scales. Through extensive experiments on the Gemma 2 language model, we demonstrate that our method effectively captures feature evolution across layers, improving feature matching quality. We also show that features persist over several layers and that our approach can approximate hidden states across layers. Our work advances the understanding of feature dynamics in neural networks and provides a new tool for mechanistic interpretability studies.
Nikita Balagansky, Ian Maksimov, Daniil Gavrilov
ICLR2
2025 Learn Your Reference Model for Real Good Alignment
abstract
Despite the fact that offline methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment do not require a direct reward model, they remain susceptible to overoptimization. This issue arises when the trained model deviates excessively from the reference policy, leading to a decrease in sample quality. We propose a novel approach of offline alignment methods, called Trust Region (including variants TR-DPO, TR-IPO, TR-KTO), which dynamically updates the reference policy throughout the training process. Our results show that TR alignment methods effectively mitigate overoptimization, enabling models to maintain strong performance even when substantially deviating from the initial reference policy. We demonstrate the efficacy of these approaches not only through toy examples that exhibit reduced overoptimization, but also through direct, side-by-side comparisons in specific tasks such as helpful and harmless dialogue, as well as summarization, where they surpass conventional methods. Additionally, we report significant improvements in general-purpose assistant setups with the Llama3 model on the AlpacaEval 2 and Arena-Hard benchmarks, highlighting the advantages of Trust Region methods over classical approaches.
Alexey Gorbatovski, Boris Shaposhnikov, Alexey Malakhov, Nikita Surnachev, Yaroslav Aksenov, Ian Maksimov, Nikita Balagansky, Daniil Gavrilov
ICLR6
2025 Revisiting Non-Acyclic GFlowNets in Discrete Environments
abstract
Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) are a family of generative models that learn to sample objects from a given probability distribution, potentially known up to a normalizing constant. Instead of working in the object space, GFlowNets proceed by sampling trajectories in an appropriately constructed directed acyclic graph environment, greatly relying on the acyclicity of the graph. In our paper, we revisit the theory that relaxes the acyclicity assumption and present a simpler theoretical framework for non-acyclic GFlowNets in discrete environments. Moreover, we provide various novel theoretical insights related to training with fixed backward policies, the nature of flow functions, and connections between entropy-regularized RL and non-acyclic GFlowNets, which naturally generalize the respective concepts and theoretical results from the acyclic setting. In addition, we experimentally re-examine the concept of loss stability in non-acyclic GFlowNet training, as well as validate our own theoretical findings.
Nikita Morozov, Ian Maksimov, Daniil Tiapkin, Sergey Samsonov
ICML2