EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jaeseong Kwon
dblp:375/6434
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-1927-5077ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 64% Compilers and program optimization · 19% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 18% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization › verified compilation
translation validation |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine · ICSE 2024 Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Software testing
compiler testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Software testing › fuzzing › greybox fuzzing
directed greybox fuzzing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Software testing
fuzzing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Software testing › compiler testing
miscompilation detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines › dynamic compilation
just-in-time compilation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine · ICSE 2024 |
Runtime systems and virtual machines › virtual machine implementation
javascript engine |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine · ICSE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fuzzing · 1.6translation validation · 0.9staged validation · 0.8SMT encoding · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation ValidationabstractIncorrect compiler optimizations can lead to unintended program behavior and security vulnerabilities. However, the enormous size and complexity of modern compilers make it challenging to ensure the correctness of optimizations. The problem becomes more severe as compiler engineers continuously add new optimizations to improve performance and support new language features. In this paper, we propose Optimuzz , a framework to effectively detect incorrect optimization bugs in such continuously changing compilers. The key idea is to combine two complementary techniques: directed grey-box fuzzing and translation validation. We design a novel optimization-directed fuzzing framework that efficiently generates input programs to trigger specific compiler optimizations. Optimuzz then uses existing translation validation tools to verify the correctness of the optimizations on the input programs. We instantiate our approach for two major compilers, LLVM and TurboFan . The results show that Optimuzz can effectively detect miscompilation bugs in these compilers, outperforming state-of-the-art tools. We also applied Optimuzz to the latest version of LLVM and discovered 55 new miscompilation bugs. Jaeseong Kwon, Bongjun Jang, Juneyoung Lee, Kihong Heo |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2024 | Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript EngineabstractWe present TurboTV, a translation validator for the JavaScript (JS) just-in-time (JIT) compiler of V8. While JS engines have become a crucial part of various software systems, their emerging adaption of JIT compilation makes it increasingly challenging to ensure their correctness. We tackle this problem with an SMT-based translation validation (TV) that checks whether a specific compilation is semantically correct. We formally define the semantics of IR of TurboFan (JIT compiler of V8) as SMT encoding. For efficient validation, we design a staged strategy for JS JIT compilers. This allows us to decompose the whole correctness checking into simpler ones. Furthermore, we utilize fuzzing to achieve practical TV. We generate a large number of JS functions using a fuzzer to trigger various optimization passes of TurboFan and validate their compilation using TurboTV. Lastly, we demonstrate that TurboTV can also be used for cross-language TV. We show that TurboTV can validate the translation chain from LLVM IR to TurboFan IR, collaborating with an off-the-shelf TV tool for LLVM. We evaluated TurboTV on various sets of JS and LLVM programs. TurboTV effectively validated a large number of compilations of TurboFan with a low false positive rate and discovered a new miscompilation in LLVM. Seungwan Kwon, Jaeseong Kwon, Wooseok Kang, Juneyoung Lee, Kihong Heo |
ICSE | 2 |