Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jaeseong Kwon

dblp:375/6434 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-1927-5077ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 64% Compilers and program optimization · 19% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 18%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › verified compilation
translation validation
1.022025
Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine · ICSE 2024
Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Software testing
compiler testing
0.912025
Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Software testing › fuzzing › greybox fuzzing
directed greybox fuzzing
0.912025
Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Software testing
fuzzing
0.912025
Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Software testing › compiler testing
miscompilation detection
0.912025
Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2025
Runtime systems and virtual machines › dynamic compilation
just-in-time compilation
0.812024
Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine · ICSE 2024
Runtime systems and virtual machines › virtual machine implementation
javascript engine
0.212024
Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine · ICSE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzing · 1.6translation validation · 0.9staged validation · 0.8SMT encoding · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Optimization-Directed Compiler Fuzzing for Continuous Translation Validation
abstract
Incorrect compiler optimizations can lead to unintended program behavior and security vulnerabilities. However, the enormous size and complexity of modern compilers make it challenging to ensure the correctness of optimizations. The problem becomes more severe as compiler engineers continuously add new optimizations to improve performance and support new language features. In this paper, we propose Optimuzz , a framework to effectively detect incorrect optimization bugs in such continuously changing compilers. The key idea is to combine two complementary techniques: directed grey-box fuzzing and translation validation. We design a novel optimization-directed fuzzing framework that efficiently generates input programs to trigger specific compiler optimizations. Optimuzz then uses existing translation validation tools to verify the correctness of the optimizations on the input programs. We instantiate our approach for two major compilers, LLVM and TurboFan . The results show that Optimuzz can effectively detect miscompilation bugs in these compilers, outperforming state-of-the-art tools. We also applied Optimuzz to the latest version of LLVM and discovered 55 new miscompilation bugs.
Jaeseong Kwon, Bongjun Jang, Juneyoung Lee, Kihong Heo
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.1
2024 Translation Validation for JIT Compiler in the V8 JavaScript Engine
abstract
We present TurboTV, a translation validator for the JavaScript (JS) just-in-time (JIT) compiler of V8. While JS engines have become a crucial part of various software systems, their emerging adaption of JIT compilation makes it increasingly challenging to ensure their correctness. We tackle this problem with an SMT-based translation validation (TV) that checks whether a specific compilation is semantically correct. We formally define the semantics of IR of TurboFan (JIT compiler of V8) as SMT encoding. For efficient validation, we design a staged strategy for JS JIT compilers. This allows us to decompose the whole correctness checking into simpler ones. Furthermore, we utilize fuzzing to achieve practical TV. We generate a large number of JS functions using a fuzzer to trigger various optimization passes of TurboFan and validate their compilation using TurboTV. Lastly, we demonstrate that TurboTV can also be used for cross-language TV. We show that TurboTV can validate the translation chain from LLVM IR to TurboFan IR, collaborating with an off-the-shelf TV tool for LLVM. We evaluated TurboTV on various sets of JS and LLVM programs. TurboTV effectively validated a large number of compilations of TurboFan with a low false positive rate and discovered a new miscompilation in LLVM.
Seungwan Kwon, Jaeseong Kwon, Wooseok Kang, Juneyoung Lee, Kihong Heo
ICSE2