Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Runyu Wu
dblp:375/8649
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Learning paradigms · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Boosting Multi-Domain Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models through Evolving Interactions between Samples · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-efficient learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Boosting Multi-Domain Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models through Evolving Interactions between Samples · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Boosting Multi-Domain Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models through Evolving Interactions between Samples · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
influence estimation · 0.9gradient-based sample interaction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Boosting Multi-Domain Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models through Evolving Interactions between SamplesabstractThe multi-domain fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) confronts a notorious trade-off among abilities across domains. Existing studies attribute this trade-off to the conflicts between samples rooted in inherent semantics. Recent approaches attempt to mitigate these conflicts through the empirical investigation or heuristic strategies. However, without a fundamental understanding of interactions between samples, they yield only marginal improvements, while incurring substantial trial-and-error costs. To address this challenge, we move beyond empirical studies by modeling interactions between samples as their influence on each other's loss, estimated using gradients. Intriguingly, we find that these interactions **evolve throughout training** rather than being purely determined by inherent semantics. Building on this insight, we propose **EV**olving **I**nteraction-guided **C**urriculum (**EVIC**), which iteratively selects samples that positively influence the overall dataset for training. By dynamically adapting the training curriculum to prioritize samples that contribute the most to the model training, EVIC effectively mitigates conflicts and improves the sample efficiency. Extensive experiments on a mixed dataset covering coding, math, and general tasks with several model architectures show that EVIC significantly outperforms all baselines across diverse capabilities. Xize Liang, Lin Yang 0009, Jie Wang 0005, Runyu Wu, Hanzhu Chen, Jianye Hao |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | Zero-shot Event Detection Using a Textual Entailment Model as an Enhanced AnnotatorabstractZero-shot event detection is a challenging task. Recent research work proposed to use a pre-trained textual entailment (TE) model on this task. However, those methods treated the TE model as a frozen annotator. We treat the TE model as an annotator that can be enhanced. We propose to use TE models to annotate large-scale unlabeled text and use annotated data to finetune the TE model, yielding an improved TE model. Finally, the improved TE model is used for inference on the test set. To improve the efficiency, we propose to use keywords to filter out sentences with a low probability of expressing event(s). To improve the coverage of keywords, we expand limited number of seed keywords using WordNet, so that we can use the TE model to annotate unlabeled text efficiently. The experimental results show that our method can outperform other baselines by 15% on the ACE05 dataset. Ziqian Zeng, Runyu Wu, Yuxiang Xiao, Xiaoda Zhong, Zhengdong Lu, Huiping Zhuang |
LREC/COLING | 2 |