Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liangguo Li

dblp:375/9996 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0007-4565-0399ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › software validation
acceptance testing
0.812024
LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024
Software testing › test generation › automated test generation
LLM-based test generation
0.812024
LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024
Software testing
test generation
0.812024
LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024
Software testing › test coverage
code coverage
0.212024
LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing · ISSTA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model fine-tuning · 0.8information extraction · 0.8algorithmic scenario generation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 LLM4Fin: Fully Automating LLM-Powered Test Case Generation for FinTech Software Acceptance Testing
abstract
FinTech software, crucial for both safety and timely market deployment, presents a compelling case for automated acceptance testing against regulatory business rules. However, the inherent challenges of comprehending unstructured natural language descriptions of these rules and crafting comprehensive test cases demand human intelligence. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) holds promise for automated test case generation, leveraging their natural language processing capabilities. Yet, their dependence on human intervention for effective prompting hampers efficiency. In response, we introduce a groundbreaking, fully automated approach for generating high-coverage test cases from natural language business rules. Our methodology seamlessly integrates the versatility of LLMs with the predictability of algorithmic methods. We fine-tune pre-trained LLMs for improved information extraction accuracy and algorithmically generate comprehensive testable scenarios for the extracted business rules. Our prototype, LLM4Fin, is designed for testing real-world stock-trading software. Experimental results demonstrate LLM4Fin’s superiority over both state-of-the-art LLM, such as ChatGPT, and skilled testing engineers. We achieve remarkable performance, with up to 98.18% and an average of 20%−110% improvement on business scenario coverage, and up to 93.72% on code coverage, while reducing the time cost from 20 minutes to a mere 7 seconds. These results provide robust evidence of the framework’s practical applicability and efficiency, marking a significant advancement in FinTech software testing.
Zhiyi Xue, Liangguo Li, Senyue Tian, Xiaohong Chen 0007, Liangyu Chen 0001, Tingting Jiang 0012, Min Zhang 0002
ISSTA2