Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Benjamin Bogø

dblp:376/1009 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-2192-3291ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 70% Distributed computing theory · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof checking
1.012026
Faster Certified Symmetry Breaking Using Orders with Auxiliary Variables · AAAI 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
proof logging
1.012026
Faster Certified Symmetry Breaking Using Orders with Auxiliary Variables · AAAI 2026
Distributed computing theory
symmetry breaking
1.012026
Faster Certified Symmetry Breaking Using Orders with Auxiliary Variables · AAAI 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
satisfiability
0.312026
Faster Certified Symmetry Breaking Using Orders with Auxiliary Variables · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lexicographic order encoding · 1.0auxiliary variable encoding · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Faster Certified Symmetry Breaking Using Orders with Auxiliary Variables
abstract
Symmetry breaking is a crucial technique in modern combinatorial solving, but it is difficult to be sure it is implemented correctly. The most successful approach to deal with bugs is to make solvers certifying, so that they output not just a solution, but also a mathematical proof of correctness in a standard format, which can then be checked by a formally verified checker. This requires justifying symmetry reasoning within the proof, but developing efficient methods for this has remained a long-standing open challenge. A fully general approach was recently proposed, but it relies on encoding lexicographic orders with big integers, which quickly becomes infeasible for large symmetries. In this work, we develop a method for instead encoding orders with auxiliary variables. We show that this leads to orders-of-magnitude speed-ups in both theory and practice by running experiments on proof logging and checking for SAT symmetry breaking using the state-of-the-art satsuma symmetry breaker and the VeriPB proof checking toolchain.
Markus Anders, Bart Bogaerts 0001, Benjamin Bogø, Arthur Gontier, Wietze Koops, Ciaran McCreesh, Magnus O. Myreen, Jakob Nordström, Andy Oertel, Adrian Rebola-Pardo, Yong Kiam Tan
AAAI3
2026 PN2CCS: A tool to encode Petri nets into calculus of communicating systems
Benjamin Bogø, Andrea Burattin, Alceste Scalas
Sci. Comput. Program.1
2024 Encoding Petri Nets into CCS
Benjamin Bogø, Andrea Burattin, Alceste Scalas
COORDINATION1