Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Erin Craig
dblp:376/1360
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4893-6671ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Structure-preserving multivariate hypothesis testing for mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell data · Bioinform. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Structure-preserving multivariate hypothesis testing for mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell data · Bioinform. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
mass spectrometry imaging |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Structure-preserving multivariate hypothesis testing for mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell data · Bioinform. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell RNA sequencing |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Structure-preserving multivariate hypothesis testing for mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell data · Bioinform. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
significance analysis of microarrays · 1.0block permutation testing · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Structure-preserving multivariate hypothesis testing for mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell dataabstractMOTIVATION: Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offer high-resolution views into tissue and cellular heterogeneity. However, conventional statistical analyses often treat sub-measurements (pixels or cells) as independent, ignoring their nested origin from individual samples. This assumption inflates the effective sample size, increases false discoveries, and undermines biological interpretation. Pixel- or cell-level averaging avoids this but sacrifices spatial or cellular resolution. RESULTS: We evaluated block-SAM on both simulated and real-world datasets. In DESI-MSI data from kidney, lung, and ovarian tumors, block-SAM consistently identified fewer-but more reliable-differential features compared to traditional-SAM. For example, in the kidney dataset, traditional-SAM identified 569 features between tumor and normal tissue, while block-SAM identified 186-all overlapping but excluding 383 likely false positives. Applied to a metastatic RCC scRNA-seq dataset comparing immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-treated versus untreated patients, traditional-SAM identified over 19,000 differentially expressed genes in malignant cells; block-SAM reduced this to 19. These results demonstrate block-SAM's ability to reduce false discoveries while retaining biologically meaningful signals across diverse high-dimensional datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code and data associated with this study are deposited on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18273497). The samr package is freely available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN). Keziah E. Liebenberg, Erin Craig, Robert Tibshirani, Livia Eberlin |
Bioinform. | 2 |