Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wangjie Ji
dblp:376/5277
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0004-4456-3945ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 56% Debugging and program repair · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
bug localization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ChatBR: Automated assessment and improvement of bug report quality using ChatGPT · ASE 2024 |
Empirical software engineering › issue report analysis
bug report quality |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ChatBR: Automated assessment and improvement of bug report quality using ChatGPT · ASE 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ChatBR: Automated assessment and improvement of bug report quality using ChatGPT · ASE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine learning · 0.8large language model · 0.8information retrieval · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | ChatBR: Automated assessment and improvement of bug report quality using ChatGPTabstractBug reports, containing crucial information such as the Observed Behavior (OB), the Expected Behavior (EB), and the Steps to Reproduce (S2R), can help developers localize and fix bugs efficiently. However, due to the increasing complexity of some bugs and the limited experience of some reporters, large numbers of bug reports miss this crucial information. Although machine learning (ML)-based and information retrieval (IR)-based approaches are proposed to detect and supplement the missing information in bug reports, the performance of these approaches depends heavily on the size and quality of bug report datasets. Lili Bo, Wangjie Ji, Xiaobing Sun 0001, Ting Zhang 0011, Xiaoxue Wu 0001, Ying Wei 0012 |
ASE | 2 |
| 2024 | A Software Bug Fixing Approach Based on Knowledge-Enhanced Large Language ModelsabstractSoftware Bug Fixing is a time-consuming task in software development and maintenance. Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) using in Automatic Program Repair (APR), they still have the limitations of generating patches with low accuracy and explainability. In this paper, we propose a software bug-fixing approach based on knowledge-enhanced large language models. First, we collect bugs as well as their fix information from bug tracking systems, such as Github and Stack Overflow. Then, we extract bug entities and inter-entity relationships using Named Entity Recognition (NER) to construct a Bug Knowledge Graph (BKG). Finally, we utilize LLMs (e.g., GPT-4) which is enhanced by the knowledge of the similar historical bugs as well as fix information from BKG to generate patches for new bugs. The experimental results show that the our approach can fix 28.52% (85\298) bugs correctly, which is significantly better than the state-of-the-art approaches. Furthermore, the generated patches are explainable and more credible. Lili Bo, Xiaobing Sun 0001, Wangjie Ji |
QRS | 4 |
| 2024 | TDFix: A lightweight tool for fixing deadlocks based on templates
Wangjie Ji, Lili Bo, Yanchi Yuan, Xiaobing Sun 0001 |
Sci. Comput. Program. | 1 |