EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thierry Giaccone
dblp:376/6317
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Question answering and dialogue systems · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › intent detection
out-of-domain detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Combining Statistical Depth and Fermat Distance for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
statistical depth |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Combining Statistical Depth and Fermat Distance for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Combining Statistical Depth and Fermat Distance for Uncertainty Quantification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lens depth · 0.8fermat distance · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Combining Statistical Depth and Fermat Distance for Uncertainty QuantificationabstractWe measure the out-of-domain uncertainty in the prediction of Neural Networks using a statistical notion called "Lens Depth'' (LD) combined with Fermat Distance, which is able to capture precisely the "depth'' of a point with respect to a distribution in feature space, without any distributional assumption. Our method also has no trainable parameter. The method is applied directly in the feature space at test time and does not intervene in training process. As such, it does not impact the performance of the original model. The proposed method gives excellent qualitative results on toy datasets and can give competitive or better uncertainty estimation on standard deep learning datasets compared to strong baseline methods. Hai-Vy Nguyen, Fabrice Gamboa, Reda Chhaibi, Sixin Zhang, Serge Gratton, Thierry Giaccone |
NeurIPS | 6 |