Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Claudia Grundke

dblp:376/8277 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-4277-7403ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 58% Optimization for machine learning · 21% Motion planning and robot control · 21%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
classical planning
1.622025
Domain-Independent Instance Generation for Classical Planning · KR 2025
Formal Representations of Classical Planning Domains · ICAPS 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
instance generation
0.912025
Domain-Independent Instance Generation for Classical Planning · KR 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
learning-based motion planning
0.912025
Domain-Independent Instance Generation for Classical Planning · KR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan representation
0.812024
Formal Representations of Classical Planning Domains · ICAPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

PDDL axioms · 1.5formal specification · 0.9answer set programming · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Domain-Independent Instance Generation for Classical Planning
abstract
Learning-based planning systems learn domain-specific knowledge that helps them to solve unseen tasks from the same planning domain. For this purpose they require a diverse set of training instances. A recent proposal for formal specifications of planning domains allows us to exactly characterize which instances are legal for a domain. We automatically generate planning tasks from such formal specifications by means of a translation to answer set programming. We experimentally examine the scalability of the approach and the suitability for learning-based planning, following the setup of the learning track of the International Planning Competition.
Claudia Grundke, Malte Helmert, Gabriele Röger
KR1
2024 Formal Representations of Classical Planning Domains
abstract
Planning domains are an important notion, e.g. when it comes to restricting the input for generalized planning or learning approaches. However, domains as specified in PDDL cannot fully capture the intuitive understanding of a planning domain. We close this semantic gap and propose using PDDL axioms to characterize the (typically infinite) set of legal tasks of a domain. A minor extension makes it possible to express all properties that can be determined in polynomial time. We demonstrate the suitability of the approach on established domains from the International Planning Competition.
Claudia Grundke, Gabriele Röger, Malte Helmert
ICAPS1