Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liancheng Fang
dblp:376/9515
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Generative modeling · 43% Language models and text generation · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 10% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | TabNAT: A Continuous-Discrete Joint Generative Framework for Tabular Data · ICML 2025 DiffPuter: Empowering Diffusion Models for Missing Data Imputation · ICLR 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | DiffPuter: Empowering Diffusion Models for Missing Data Imputation · ICLR 2025 TabNAT: A Continuous-Discrete Joint Generative Framework for Tabular Data · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › discrete diffusion model
diffusion language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | d-TreeRPO: Towards More Reliable Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | d-TreeRPO: Towards More Reliable Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language Models · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › conditional generation
diffusion-based imputation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DiffPuter: Empowering Diffusion Models for Missing Data Imputation · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TabNAT: A Continuous-Discrete Joint Generative Framework for Tabular Data · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
test-time compute |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | TestNUC: Enhancing Test-Time Computing Approaches and Scaling through Neighboring Unlabeled Data Consistency · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
watermarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Watermarked LLMs be Identified by Users via Crafted Prompts? · ICLR 2025 |
Digital forensics and information hiding › watermarking › text watermarking
LLM watermarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Watermarked LLMs be Identified by Users via Crafted Prompts? · ICLR 2025 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Can Watermarked LLMs be Identified by Users via Crafted Prompts? · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
watermark key randomization · 1.7prompt-based identification · 1.7diffusion model · 1.7conditional sampling · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.0policy optimization · 1.0open-domain evaluation · 1.0multi-stage guardrails · 1.0test-time scaling · 0.9next-token prediction · 0.9masked generative modeling · 0.9expectation-maximization · 0.9diffusion · 0.9consistency regularization · 0.9bidirectional attention · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Deep Research with Open-Domain Evaluation and Multi-Stage Guardrails for SafetyabstractWei-Chieh Huang, Henry Peng Zou, Yaozu Wu, Dongyuan Li, Yankai Chen, Weizhi Zhang, Yangning Li, Angelo Zangari, Jizhou Guo, Chunyu Miao, Liancheng Fang, Langzhou He, Yinghui Li, Renhe Jiang, Philip S. Yu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Wei-Chieh Huang, Henry Peng Zou, Yaozu Wu, Dongyuan Li, Yankai Chen 0001, Weizhi Zhang 0001, Yangning Li, Angelo Zangari, Jizhou Guo, Chunyu Miao, Liancheng Fang, Langzhou He, Renhe Jiang, Philip S. Yu |
ACL (1) | 11 |
| 2026 | d-TreeRPO: Towards More Reliable Policy Optimization for Diffusion Language ModelsabstractLeyi Pan, Shuchang Tao, Yunpeng Zhai, Zheyu Fu, Liancheng Fang, Minghua He, Lingzhe Zhang, Zhaoyang Liu, Bolin Ding, Aiwei Liu, Lijie Wen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Leyi Pan, Shuchang Tao, Yunpeng Zhai, Zheyu Fu, Liancheng Fang, Minghua He, Lingzhe Zhang, Zhaoyang Liu 0003, Bolin Ding, Aiwei Liu, Lijie Wen 0001 |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2025 | TestNUC: Enhancing Test-Time Computing Approaches and Scaling through Neighboring Unlabeled Data ConsistencyabstractHenry Peng Zou, Zhengyao Gu, Yue Zhou, Yankai Chen, Weizhi Zhang, Liancheng Fang, Yibo Wang, Yangning Li, Kay Liu, Philip S. Yu. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Henry Peng Zou, Zhengyao Gu, Yankai Chen 0001, Weizhi Zhang 0001, Liancheng Fang, Yibo Wang 0001, Yangning Li, Kay Liu, Philip S. Yu |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2025 | Can Watermarked LLMs be Identified by Users via Crafted Prompts?abstractText watermarking for Large Language Models (LLMs) has made significant progress in detecting LLM outputs and preventing misuse. Current watermarking techniques offer high detectability, minimal impact on text quality, and robustness to text editing.
However, current researches lack investigation into the imperceptibility of watermarking techniques in LLM services.
This is crucial as LLM providers may not want to disclose the presence of watermarks in real-world scenarios, as it could reduce user willingness to use the service and make watermarks more vulnerable to attacks. This work is the first to investigate the imperceptibility of watermarked LLMs. We design an identification algorithm called Water-Probe that detects watermarks through well-designed prompts to the LLM. Our key motivation is that current watermarked LLMs expose consistent biases under the same watermark key, resulting in similar differences across prompts under different watermark keys. Experiments show that almost all mainstream watermarking algorithms are easily identified with our well-designed prompts,
while Water-Probe demonstrates a minimal false positive rate for non-watermarked LLMs.
Finally, we propose that the key to enhancing the imperceptibility of watermarked LLMs is to increase the randomness of watermark key selection. Based on this, we introduce the Water-Bag strategy, which significantly improves watermark imperceptibility by merging multiple watermark keys. Aiwei Liu, Sheng Guan, Leyi Pan, Liancheng Fang, Lijie Wen 0001, Philip S. Yu, Xuming Hu |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2025 | DiffPuter: Empowering Diffusion Models for Missing Data ImputationabstractGenerative models play an important role in missing data imputation in that they aim to learn the joint distribution of full data. However, applying advanced deep generative models (such as Diffusion models) to missing data imputation is challenging due to 1) the inherent incompleteness of the training data and 2) the difficulty in performing conditional inference from unconditional generative models. To deal with these challenges, this paper introduces DiffPuter, a tailored diffusion model combined with the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm for missing data imputation. DiffPuter iteratively trains a diffusion model to learn the joint distribution of missing and observed data and performs an accurate conditional sampling to update the missing values using a tailored reversed sampling strategy. Our theoretical analysis shows that DiffPuter's training step corresponds to the maximum likelihood estimation of data density (M-step), and its sampling step represents the Expected A Posteriori estimation of missing values (E-step). Extensive experiments across ten diverse datasets and comparisons with 17 different imputation methods demonstrate DiffPuter's superior performance. Notably, DiffPuter achieves an average improvement of 8.10\% in MAE and 5.64\% in RMSE compared to the most competitive existing method. Liancheng Fang, Qitian Wu, Philip S. Yu |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | TabNAT: A Continuous-Discrete Joint Generative Framework for Tabular DataabstractWhile autoregressive models dominate natural language generation, their application to tabular data remains limited due to two challenges: 1) tabular data contains heterogeneous types, whereas autoregressive next-token (distribution) prediction is designed for discrete data, and 2) tabular data is column permutation-invariant, requiring flexible generation orders. Traditional autoregressive models, with their fixed generation order, struggle with tasks like missing data imputation, where the target and conditioning columns vary. To address these issues, we propose Diffusion-nested Non-autoregressive Transformer (TabNAT), a hybrid model combining diffusion processes and masked generative modeling. For continuous columns, TabNAT uses a diffusion model to parameterize their conditional distributions, while for discrete columns, it employs next-token prediction with KL divergence minimization. A masked Transformer with bi-directional attention enables order-agnostic generation, allowing it to learn the distribution of target columns conditioned on arbitrary observed columns. Extensive experiments on ten datasets with diverse properties demonstrate TabNAT's superiority in both unconditional tabular data generation and conditional missing data imputation tasks. Liancheng Fang, Qitian Wu, Philip S. Yu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Do We Really Need Graph Convolution During Training? Light Post-Training Graph-ODE for Efficient RecommendationabstractThe efficiency and scalability of graph convolution networks (GCNs) in training recommender systems (RecSys) have been persistent concerns, hindering their deployment in real-world applications. This paper presents a critical examination of the necessity of graph convolutions during the training phase and introduces an innovative alternative: the Light Post-Training Graph Ordinary-Differential-Equation (LightGODE). Our investigation reveals that the benefits of GCNs are more pronounced during testing rather than training. Motivated by this, LightGODE utilizes a novel post-training graph convolution method that bypasses the computation-intensive message passing of GCNs and employs a non-parametric continuous graph ordinary-differential-equation (ODE) to dynamically model node representations. This approach drastically reduces training time while achieving fine-grained post-training graph convolution to avoid the distortion of the original training embedding space, termed the embedding discrepancy issue. We validate our model across several real-world datasets of different scales, demonstrating that LightGODE not only outperforms GCN-based models in terms of efficiency and effectiveness but also significantly mitigates the embedding discrepancy commonly associated with deeper graph convolution layers. Our LightGODE challenges the prevailing paradigms in RecSys training and suggests re-evaluating the role of graph convolutions, potentially guiding future developments of efficient large-scale graph-based RecSys. Weizhi Zhang 0001, Liangwei Yang, Zihe Song 0001, Henry Peng Zou, Ke Xu 0018, Liancheng Fang, Philip S. Yu |
CIKM | 6 |