Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xiele Wu

dblp:376/9592 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0005-4578-2880ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 55% Vision and language · 24% Language models and text generation · 11%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video coding · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
1.022025
T2I-Scorer: Quantitative Evaluation on Text-to-Image Generation via Fine-Tuned Large Multi-Modal Models · ACM Multimedia 2024
Towards a New Paradigm of Visual Signal Compression · ACM Multimedia 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment › preference alignment
human feedback alignment
0.912025
Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
rectified flow
0.912025
Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
reward modeling
0.912025
Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
video generation
0.912025
Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback · NeurIPS 2025
Image and video coding › image compression › lossy image compression
extreme low bit-rate compression
0.912025
Towards a New Paradigm of Visual Signal Compression · ACM Multimedia 2025
Image and video coding
image compression
0.912025
Towards a New Paradigm of Visual Signal Compression · ACM Multimedia 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.812024
T2I-Scorer: Quantitative Evaluation on Text-to-Image Generation via Fine-Tuned Large Multi-Modal Models · ACM Multimedia 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
text-to-image evaluation
0.812024
T2I-Scorer: Quantitative Evaluation on Text-to-Image Generation via Fine-Tuned Large Multi-Modal Models · ACM Multimedia 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language generation
image-to-text generation
0.312025
Towards a New Paradigm of Visual Signal Compression · ACM Multimedia 2025
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.212024
T2I-Scorer: Quantitative Evaluation on Text-to-Image Generation via Fine-Tuned Large Multi-Modal Models · ACM Multimedia 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large multimodal model · 3.3multi-task training · 1.5instruction tuning · 1.5reward-weighted regression · 0.9reward guidance · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards a New Paradigm of Visual Signal Compression
abstract
Ultra-low bitrate image compression is a challenging and demand- ing topic. With the development of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), a Cross Modality Compression (CMC) paradigm of Image-Text- Image has emerged. Compared with traditional codecs, this semantic- level compression can reduce image data size to 0.1% or even lower, which has strong potential applications. However, CMC has cer- tain defects in consistency with the original image and perceptual quality. To inspire insights into such a problem, we introduce CMC- Bench, a benchmark of the cooperative performance of Image-to- Text (I2T) and Text-to-Image (T2I) models for image compression. This benchmark covers 18,000 and 40,000 images respectively to verify 6 mainstream I2T and 12 T2I models, including 160,000 sub- jective preference scores annotated by human experts. At ultra-low bitrates, it proves that the combination of some I2T and T2I models has surpassed the most advanced visual signal codecs; meanwhile, it highlights where LMMs can be further optimized toward the compression task. We encourage LMM developers to participate in this test to promote the evolution of visual signal codec protocols.
Chunyi Li 0001, Xiele Wu, Haoning Wu 0001, Donghui Feng 0003, Guo Lu, Xiongkuo Min, Xiaohong Liu 0001, Guangtao Zhai, Weisi Lin
ACM Multimedia2
2025 Improving Video Generation with Human Feedback
abstract
Video generation has achieved significant advances through rectified flow techniques, but issues like unsmooth motion and misalignment between videos and prompts persist. In this work, we develop a systematic pipeline that harnesses human feedback to mitigate these problems and refine the video generation model. Specifically, we begin by constructing a large-scale human preference dataset focused on modern video generation models, incorporating pairwise annotations across multi-dimensions. We then introduce VideoReward, a multi-dimensional video reward model, and examine how annotations and various design choices impact its rewarding efficacy. From a unified reinforcement learning perspective aimed at maximizing reward with KL regularization, we introduce three alignment algorithms for flow-based models. These include two training-time strategies: direct preference optimization for flow (Flow-DPO) and reward weighted regression for flow (Flow-RWR), and an inference-time technique, Flow-NRG, which applies reward guidance directly to noisy videos. Experimental results indicate that VideoReward significantly outperforms existing reward models, and Flow-DPO demonstrates superior performance compared to both Flow-RWR and supervised fine-tuning methods. Additionally, Flow-NRG lets users assign custom weights to multiple objectives during inference, meeting personalized video quality needs.
Jie Liu 0047, Gongye Liu, Jiajun Liang, Ziyang Yuan, Xiaokun Liu, Mingwu Zheng, Xiele Wu, Qiulin Wang, Menghan Xia, Xintao Wang 0002, Xiaohong Liu 0001, Pengfei Wan 0001, Di Zhang 0026, Kun Gai, Yujiu Yang 0001, Wanli Ouyang
NeurIPS7
2024 T2I-Scorer: Quantitative Evaluation on Text-to-Image Generation via Fine-Tuned Large Multi-Modal Models
abstract
Text-to-image (T2I) generation is a pivotal and core interest within the realm of AI content generation. Amid the swift advancements of both open-source (such as Stable Diffusion) and proprietary (for example, DALLE, MidJourney) T2I models, there is a notable absence of a comprehensive and robust quantitative framework for evaluating their output quality. Traditional methods of quality assessment overlook the textual prompts when judging images; meanwhile, the advent of large multi-modal models (LMMs) introduces the capability to incorporate text prompts in evaluations, yet the challenge of fine-tuning these models for precise T2I quality assessment remains unresolved. In our study, we introduce the T2I-Scorer, a novel two-stage training methodology aimed at fine-tuning LMMs for T2I evaluation. For the first stage, we collect 397K GPT-4V-labeled question-answer pairs related to T2I evaluation. Termed as T2I-ITD, the pseudo-labeled dataset is analyzed and examined by human, and used for instruction tuning to improve the LMM's low-level quality perception. The first stage model, T2I-Scorer-IT, has reached superior accuracy on T2I evaluation than all kinds of existing T2I metrics under zero-shot settings. For the second stage, we define an explicit multi-task training scheme to further align the LMM with human opinion scores, and the fine-tuned T2I-Scorer can reach state-of-the-art accuracy on both image quality and image-text alignment perspectives with significant improvements. We anticipate the proposed metrics can serve as a reliable metric to gauge the ability of T2I generation models in the future. We will make code, data, and weights publicly available.
Haoning Wu 0001, Xiele Wu, Chunyi Li 0001, Chaofeng Chen, Xiaohong Liu 0001, Guangtao Zhai, Weisi Lin
ACM Multimedia2