Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuanyi Lin

dblp:376/9819 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4069-2550ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
deep learning testing
0.912025
When AllClose Fails: Round-Off Error Estimation for Deep Learning Programs · ASE 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

round-off error analysis · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 LLM-Powered Silent Bug Fuzzing in Deep Learning Libraries via Versatile and Controlled Bug Transfer
abstract
Deep learning (DL) libraries are widely used in critical applications, where even subtle silent bugs can lead to serious consequences. While existing DL fuzzing techniques have made progress in detecting crashes, they inherently struggle to detect silent bugs due to the lack of effective test programs and corresponding oracles. Building on the observation that historical bug reports contain rich, underutilized information about silent bugs, we leverage large language models (LLMs) to perform versatile yet controlled bug transfer for silent bug fuzzing. Specifically, our approach uses LLMs to extract context-aware bug patterns from historical issues, match semantically related Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) using functionality-based embeddings, and synthesize test cases with customized oracles. This enables proactive detection of silent bugs by transferring high-risk contexts and oracle designs from known buggy APIs to functionally similar target APIs. To ensure the reliability of our context-aware bug transfer, we introduce an LLM-powered self-validation module that systematically evaluates the validity of each transferred bug instance. We implement this methodology in a tool named TransFuzz and evaluate it on three mainstream DL libraries: PyTorch, TensorFlow, and MindSpore. TransFuzz successfully discovers 79 previously unknown bugs (12 confirmed as Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)) in 10 bug types, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalizability in migrating DL library bug discovery capabilities.
Dongwei Xiao, Daoyuan Wu, Shuai Wang 0011, Jiali Zhao, Yuanyi Lin, Tongtong Xu, Shaohua Wang 0002
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.6
2025 When AllClose Fails: Round-Off Error Estimation for Deep Learning Programs
Qi Zhan, Xing Hu 0008, Yuanyi Lin, Tongtong Xu, Xin Xia 0001, Shanping Li
ASE3
2023 Fuzz Testing for Rust Library Functions
abstract
Rust is an emerging programming language that has gained popularity in many academic and industrial projects due to its memory safety features. However, despite its safety advantages, there are still many serious bugs in existing Rust projects. The lack of suitable fuzz targets has been a major challenge in Rust fuzz testing, as existing fuzzing tools often rely on manual efforts to write test targets, which is time-consuming and cannot be directly applied to library function interfaces. While the previous work has made significant progress in generating fuzz targets for Rust, it still cannot effectively test special functions with generics and polymorphism.To address this issue, this paper proposes an automated approach for generating fuzz targets for Rust library functions, called RVFuzz. RVFuzz addresses the challenges by performing static analysis through variable instantiation, ensuring that special functions in Rust, such as those with generics and polymorphism, are covered in the interface sequence analysis. It then traverses the library function dependency graph to generate a set of reasonable and non-redundant target function sequences for fuzz testing. Any compilation errors encountered during the process are used to refine the sequence generation. RVFuzz successfully generated fuzz targets for 10 popular Rust projects, achieving an impressive interface coverage rate of 92.3%.
Yongjian Guo, Xi Xiao 0001, Yuanyi Lin, Hao Li 0027, Xiangbo Wu
TrustCom3