Hieu Huynh

dblp:377/1031 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2310-1376ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 84% Program analysis · 16%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
API testing
0.812024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024
Software testing
black-box testing
0.812024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024
Program analysis › static analysis › constraint-based analysis
constraint inference
0.812024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024
Software testing
regression testing
0.812024
Segment-Based Test Case Prioritization: A Multi-objective Approach · ISSTA 2024
Software testing › API testing
REST API testing
0.812024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024
Software testing › regression testing
test case prioritization
0.812024
Segment-Based Test Case Prioritization: A Multi-objective Approach · ISSTA 2024
Software testing
test generation
0.812024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024
Software testing › regression testing › test case prioritization
coverage-based test case prioritization
0.212024
Segment-Based Test Case Prioritization: A Multi-objective Approach · ISSTA 2024
Program analysis
schema validation
0.212024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024
Software testing
test oracle
0.212024
Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

web page segmentation · 0.8large language model · 0.8evolutionary search · 0.8NSGA-II · 0.8AGE-MOEA · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A DOM-structural cohesion analysis approach for segmentation of modern web pages
Hieu Huynh, Quoc-Tri Le, Vu Nguyen 0003, Tien Nguyen
World Wide Web (WWW)1
2024 Segment-Based Test Case Prioritization: A Multi-objective Approach
abstract
Regression testing of software is a crucial but time-consuming task, especially in the context of user interface (UI) testing where multiple microservices must be validated simultaneously. Test case prioritization (TCP) is a cost-efficient solution to address this by scheduling test cases in an execution order that maximizes an objective function, generally aimed at increasing the fault detection rate. While several techniques have been proposed for TCP, most rely on source code information which is usually not available for UI testing. In this paper, we introduce a multi-objective optimization approach to prioritize UI test cases, using evolutionary search algorithms and four coverage criteria focusing on web page elements as objectives for the optimization problem. Our method, which does not require source code information, is evaluated using two evolutionary algorithms (AGE-MOEA and NSGA-II) and compared with other TCP methods on a self-collected dataset of 11 test suites. The results show that our approach significantly outperforms other methods in terms of Average Percentage of Faults Detected (APFD) and APFD with Cost (APFDc), achieving the highest scores of 87.8% and 79.2%, respectively. We also introduce a new dataset and demonstrate the significant improvement of our approach over existing ones via empirical experiments. The paper’s contributions include the application of web page segmentation in TCP, the construction of a new dataset for UI TCP, and empirical comparisons that demonstrate the improvement of our approach.
Hieu Huynh, Nhu Pham, Tien N. Nguyen, Vu Nguyen 0003
ISSTA1
2024 Using LLM for Mining and Testing Constraints in API Testing
abstract
Testing Representational State Transfer (REST) APIs is crucial for ensuring the reliability and performance of APIs, which are essential to modern web services. This testing process helps identify and resolve issues related to data exchange and integration with other systems. Among the various API testing techniques, black-box testing relies on the OpenAPI Specification (OAS) to generate test cases and data. However, current API test automation methods are primarily focused on status code [10] and schema validation [1]. Status code validation involves ensuring that each HTTP request returns a response with a status code, a three-digit integer that indicates the outcome of the request. Schema validation verifies the correctness of the response data by comparing it to the schema. This includes checking that all required properties are present and that data types of these properties align with the schema specified.
Hieu Huynh, Quoc-Tri Le, Tien N. Nguyen, Vu Nguyen 0003
ASE1