Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pedro Carrott
dblp:377/2329
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
proof generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software Verification · ICSE 2025 |
Program verification
theorem proving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software Verification · ICSE 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software Verification · ICSE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval augmentation · 1.7large language model · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Compositional Bug Detection for Internally Unsafe Libraries: A Logical Approach to Type Unsoundness
Pedro Carrott, Sacha-Élie Ayoun, Azalea Raad |
ECOOP | 1 |
| 2025 | Rango: Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Proving for Automated Software VerificationabstractFormal verification using proof assistants, such as Coq, enables the creation of high-quality software. However, the verification process requires significant expertise and manual effort to write proofs. Recent work has explored automating proof synthesis using machine learning and large language models (LLMs). This work has shown that identifying relevant premises, such as lemmas and definitions, can aid synthesis. We present Rango, a fully automated proof synthesis tool for Coq that automatically identifies relevant premises and also similar proofs from the current project and uses them during synthesis. Rango uses retrieval augmentation at every step of the proof to automatically determine which proofs and premises to include in the context of its fine-tuned LLM. In this way, Rango adapts to the project and to the evolving state of the proof. We create a new dataset, CoqStoq, of 2,226 open-source Coq projects and 196,929 theorems from GitHub, which includes both training data and a curated evaluation benchmark of well-maintained projects. On this benchmark, Rango synthesizes proofs for 32.0% of the theorems, which is 29% more theorems than the prior state-of-the-art tool Tactician. Our evaluation also shows that Rango adding relevant proofs to its context leads to a 47% increase in the number of theorems proven. Kyle Thompson, Nuno Saavedra, Pedro Carrott, Kevin Fisher, Alex Sanchez-Stern, Yuriy Brun, João F. Ferreira 0001, Sorin Lerner, Emily First |
ICSE | 3 |