EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Renaud Gaucher
dblp:377/2349
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
byzantine fault tolerance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unified Breakdown Analysis for Byzantine Robust Gossip · ICML 2025 |
Distributed systems › data aggregation
robust aggregation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unified Breakdown Analysis for Byzantine Robust Gossip · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
decentralized learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Unified Breakdown Analysis for Byzantine Robust Gossip · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
robust-sum aggregation · 1.7gossip protocol · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Unified Breakdown Analysis for Byzantine Robust GossipabstractIn decentralized machine learning, different devices communicate in a peer-to-peer manner to collaboratively learn from each other’s data. Such approaches are vulnerable to misbehaving (or Byzantine) devices. We introduce F-RG, a general framework for building robust decentralized algorithms with guarantees arising from robust-sum-like aggregation rules F. We then investigate the notion of breakdown point, and show an upper bound on the number of adversaries that decentralized algorithms can tolerate. We introduce a practical robust aggregation rule, coined CS+, such that CS+-RG has a near-optimal breakdown. Other choices of aggregation rules lead to existing algorithms such as ClippedGossip or NNA. We give experimental evidence to validate the effectiveness of CS+-RG and highlight the gap with NNA, in particular against a novel attack tailored to decentralized communications. Renaud Gaucher, Aymeric Dieuleveut, Hadrien Hendrikx |
ICML | 1 |