Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qiaobo Li
dblp:377/2522
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 45% Optimization for machine learning · 35% Trustworthy machine learning · 21% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Sketched Gaussian Mechanism for Private Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
communication-efficient federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sketched Gaussian Mechanism for Private Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sketched Gaussian Mechanism for Private Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sketched Gaussian Mechanism for Private Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sketching for Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharper Analysis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sketching for Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharper Analysis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
demographic parity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sketching for Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharper Analysis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair Regression · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hessian analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sketching for Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharper Analysis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
sketching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sketching for Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharper Analysis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sketching · 1.7rényi differential privacy · 1.7gradient compression · 1.7gaussian mechanism · 1.7wasserstein barycenter · 1.5optimal transport · 1.5laplace mechanism · 1.5histogram density estimation · 1.5randomized sketching · 0.8convergence analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Loss Gradient Gaussian Width based Generalization and Optimization GuaranteesabstractGeneralization and optimization guarantees on the population loss often rely on uniform convergence based analysis, typically based on the Rademacher complexity of the predictors. The rich representation power of modern models has led to concerns about this approach. In this paper, we present generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of the complexity of the gradients, as measured by the Loss Gradient Gaussian Width (LGGW). First, we introduce generalization guarantees directly in terms of the LGGW under a flexible gradient domination condition. Second, we show that sample reuse in ERM does not make the empirical gradients deviate from the population gradients as long as the LGGW is small. Third, focusing on deep networks, we bound their single-sample LGGW in terms of the Gaussian width of the featurizer, i.e., the output of the last-but-one layer. To our knowledge, our generalization and optimization guarantees in terms of LGGW are the first results of its kind, and hold considerable promise towards quantitatively tight bounds for deep models. Arindam Banerjee 0001, Qiaobo Li, Yingxue Zhou |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2025 | On the Power of Multitask Representation Learning with Gradient DescentabstractRepresentation learning, particularly multi-task representation learning, has gained widespread popularity in various deep learning applications, ranging from computer vision to natural language processing, due to its remarkable generalization performance. Despite its growing use, our understanding of the underlying mechanisms remains limited. In this paper, we provide a theoretical analysis elucidating why multi-task representation learning outperforms its single-task counterpart in scenarios involving over-parameterized two-layer convolutional neural networks trained by gradient descent. Our analysis is based on a data model that encompasses both task-shared and task-specific features, a setting commonly encountered in real-world applications. We also present experiments on synthetic and real-world data to illustrate and validate our theoretical findings. Qiaobo Li, Zixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Yiwen Kou, Yuan Cao 0006, Quanquan Gu |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2025 | Sketched Adaptive Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharp Convergence AnalysisabstractCombining gradient compression with adaptive optimizers is a highly desirable goal in distributed learning, with potential benefits in both fewer communication rounds and less per-round communication. In spite of preliminary empirical promise, certain major challenges in the convergence analysis of such methods have stayed open: handling compression based approximation of both first and second moments (pre-conditioner) which appear as a ratio; avoiding dependence on the number of parameters, which is extremely large in modern deep models; and providing high-probability guarantees instead of in-expectation, which can hide high variance behavior.
In this work, we introduce a family of Sketched Adaptive Distributed Learning (SADL) algorithms which can use suitable unbiased gradient sketching for compression with suitable adaptive optimization algorithms. As our main contribution, we provide theoretical convergence guarantees of SADL algorithms which addresses all of the existing challenges. In particular, our guarantees hold with high probability, picks up only a logarithmic dependence on the number of parameters, and the first and second moment approximation is handled precisely yielding a dependence on the intrinsic dimension of the loss Hessian, which is significantly smaller than the full dimensionality of deep learning models. Empirically, the SADL algorithms are shown to be competitive with and often outperform baselines on both vision and language tasks, in both supervised fine-tuning and training-from-scratch regimes. Further, the SADL algorithms are also competitive with the state-of-the-art communication-efficient distributed learning algorithms based on error feedback. Qiaobo Li, Arindam Banerjee 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Sketched Gaussian Mechanism for Private Federated LearningabstractCommunication cost and privacy are two major considerations in federated learning (FL). For communication cost, gradient compression by sketching the clients’ transmitted model updates is often used for reducing per‐round communication. For privacy, the Gaussian mechanism (GM), which consists of clipping updates and adding Gaussian noise, is commonly used to guarantee client‐level differential privacy. Existing literature on private FL analyzes privacy of sketching and GM in an isolated manner, illustrating that sketching provides privacy determined by the sketching dimension and that GM has to supply any additional desired privacy.
In this paper, we introduce the Sketched Gaussian Mechanism (SGM), which directly combines sketching and the Gaussian mechanism for privacy. Using Rényi-DP tools, we present a joint analysis of SGM's overall privacy guarantee, which is significantly more flexible and sharper compared to isolated analysis of sketching and GM privacy. In particular, we prove that the privacy level of SGM for a fixed noise magnitude is proportional to $1/\sqrt{b}$, where $b$ is the sketching dimension, indicating that (for moderate $b$) SGM can provide much stronger privacy guarantees than the original GM under the same noise budget. We demonstrate the application of SGM to FL with either gradient descent or adaptive server optimizers, and establish theoretical results on optimization convergence, which exhibits only a logarithmic dependence on the number of parameters $d$. Experimental results confirm that at the same privacy level, SGM based FL is at least competitive with non‐sketching private FL variants and outperforms them in some settings. Moreover, using adaptive optimization at the server improves empirical performance while maintaining the privacy guarantees. Qiaobo Li, Arindam Banerjee 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Differentially Private Post-Processing for Fair RegressionabstractThis paper describes a differentially private post-processing algorithm for learning fair regressors satisfying statistical parity, addressing privacy concerns of machine learning models trained on sensitive data, as well as fairness concerns of their potential to propagate historical biases. Our algorithm can be applied to post-process any given regressor to improve fairness by remapping its outputs. It consists of three steps: first, the output distributions are estimated privately via histogram density estimation and the Laplace mechanism, then their Wasserstein barycenter is computed, and the optimal transports to the barycenter are used for post-processing to satisfy fairness. We analyze the sample complexity of our algorithm and provide fairness guarantee, revealing a trade-off between the statistical bias and variance induced from the choice of the number of bins in the histogram, in which using less bins always favors fairness at the expense of error. Ruicheng Xian, Qiaobo Li, Gautam Kamath 0001, Han Zhao 0002 |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Sketching for Distributed Deep Learning: A Sharper AnalysisabstractThe high communication cost between the server and the clients is a significant bottleneck in scaling distributed learning for overparametrized deep models. One popular approach for reducing this communication overhead is randomized sketching. However, existing theoretical analyses for sketching-based distributed learning (sketch-DL) either incur a prohibitive dependence on the ambient dimension or need additional restrictive assumptions such as heavy-hitters. Nevertheless, despite existing pessimistic analyses, empirical evidence suggests that sketch-DL is competitive with its uncompressed counterpart, thus motivating a sharper analysis. In this work, we introduce a sharper ambient dimension-independent convergence analysis for sketch-DL using the second-order geometry specified by the loss Hessian. Our results imply ambient dimension-independent communication complexity for sketch-DL. We present empirical results both on the loss Hessian and overall accuracy of sketch-DL supporting our theoretical results. Taken together, our results provide theoretical justification for the observed empirical success of sketch-DL. Mayank Shrivastava, Berivan Isik, Qiaobo Li, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Arindam Banerjee 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |