Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jenna Jacob

dblp:377/2728 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 50% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-AI interaction › large language model interaction › language-based interaction
natural language interface
0.912025
Teaching Things To Think: Bootstrapping Local Reasoning for Smart(er) Devices · PerCom 2025
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
smart devices
0.912025
Teaching Things To Think: Bootstrapping Local Reasoning for Smart(er) Devices · PerCom 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data bootstrapping · 0.9language model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Teaching Things To Think: Bootstrapping Local Reasoning for Smart(er) Devices
abstract
Smart devices often use natural language understanding (NLU) to infer user goals. NLU works by extracting user intents from text, then mapping these intents to rigid sets of rules that specify system responses (i.e., slot filling). NLU behaves best when intents and their targets are well-specified (e.g., "set brightness to 50%"), and when the rules implement all desirable responses. NLU falters, however, when responses demand a deeper level of reasoning than predefined rules can provide, e.g., when intents are under-specified (e.g., "make a warm glow") or context-sensitive information is requested (e.g., "why is it so hot in here?"). Toward more flexible user-device interactions, we re-frame the challenge as one of building thoughtful things: devices that leverage a local capacity for reasoning about their internal states to generate responses rather than retrieving them from constrained rule sets. We propose an end-to-end framework for "teaching things to think" that trains a language model to generate valid, device-specific actions and natural language explanations in response to unconstrained language that is out-of-scope for slot filling NLU. Our key insight is that we can bootstrap this generative model from purely synthetic data constructed using a formal definition of a device’s state. The resulting model is small enough to run on-device, with no runtime cloud dependency. We implement two thoughtful things (a lamp and a thermostat) on real hardware and explore their potential to generate and explain device states in response to commands and inquiries.
Evan King, Haoxiang Yu, Sahil Vartak, Jenna Jacob, Christine Julien 0001
PerCom4