Antonio Oroz

dblp:377/3847 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › efficient graph learning › data-efficient graph learning
active learning on graphs
0.812024
Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
bayesian uncertainty estimation
0.812024
Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.812024
Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
0.812024
Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.812024
Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty sampling · 0.8bayesian inference · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Uncertainty for Active Learning on Graphs
abstract
Uncertainty Sampling is an Active Learning strategy that aims to improve the data efficiency of machine learning models by iteratively acquiring labels of data points with the highest uncertainty. While it has proven effective for independent data its applicability to graphs remains under-explored. We propose the first extensive study of Uncertainty Sampling for node classification: (1) We benchmark Uncertainty Sampling beyond predictive uncertainty and highlight a significant performance gap to other Active Learning strategies. (2) We develop ground-truth Bayesian uncertainty estimates in terms of the data generating process and prove their effectiveness in guiding Uncertainty Sampling toward optimal queries. We confirm our results on synthetic data and design an approximate approach that consistently outperforms other uncertainty estimators on real datasets. (3) Based on this analysis, we relate pitfalls in modeling uncertainty to existing methods. Our analysis enables and informs the development of principled uncertainty estimation on graphs.
Dominik Fuchsgruber, Tom Wollschläger, Bertrand Charpentier, Antonio Oroz, Stephan Günnemann
ICML4