Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guillaume Chacun
dblp:377/4767
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-3253-7992ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data integration and cleaning · 87% Data mining · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing › data cleaning
data repair |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A-DARTS: Stable Model Selection for Data Repair in Time Series · ICDE 2025 |
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A-DARTS: Stable Model Selection for Data Repair in Time Series · ICDE 2025 |
Data mining
time series analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | A-DARTS: Stable Model Selection for Data Repair in Time Series · ICDE 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pruning · 0.9automated machine learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A-DARTS: Stable Model Selection for Data Repair in Time SeriesabstractTime series often present gaps in the data. This phenomenon, also called missing values, is so prevalent that a cottage industry of missing-value imputation algorithms exists, each with different capabilities and efficacy/efficiency tradeoffs. So far, however, there has been no way to accurately select the most appropriate approach among all algorithms, given a new time series requiring imputation. In this paper, we introduce a new configuration-free system, A-DARTS (for Automated DAta Repair in Time Series), to automatically select the best imputation technique for a given faulty time series. A-DARTS's recommendation engine is trained via an iterative process that carefully learns the behavior of imputation algorithms using an extensive dataset of time series that we curated. The selection process is made efficient by several new pruning techniques particularly adjusted to time series data. Applications that manipulate time series can now easily embed A-DARTS's recommendation engine and impute data on the fly. Our experiments show that our system picks, on average, the best imputation algorithm 20% more frequently than the best-in-class AutoML technique. Moreover, it produces stable recommendations across datasets by incurring 2.5x less error variance, eliminating the stability issue observed in all state-of-the-art methods we tested. Mourad Khayati, Guillaume Chacun, Zakhar Tymchenko, Philippe Cudré-Mauroux |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2024 | DroneBandit: Multi-armed contextual bandits for collaborative edge-to-cloud inference in resource-constrained nanodronesabstractIn recent years, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seen a remarkable expansion. Traditionally, applications primarily relied on edge computing, closer to data sources. However, today edge computing approaches are outstripped by modern AI demands. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework together with an online decision algorithm based on multi-armed contextual bandits (DroneBandit), for the dynamic allocation of inference tasks between edge and cloud, to increase inference performance. Our test environment consists of a resource-constrained nanodrone equipped with a custom DNN for obstacle detection, able to achieve 80% accuracy and 71% F2-score. DroneBandit runs on the drone and chooses the optimal cutting point for each iteration on the fly. The decision is based on predicted back-end delays (i.e. data transfer and inference time on the cloud) and observed front-end delays (i.e. inference time on the edge). DroneBandit achieves 83% accuracy and 89% Top3 accuracy in predicting the ideal cutting point on simulations. Our framework demonstrates enhanced task allocation adaptability, enabling efficient computation offloading and edge computing reliance in varying network conditions. Our experiments, conducted on a nanodrone with an ARM CPU and GAP8 RISC-V accelerator, incorporate quantization and optimization, showcasing efficient obstacle detection in dynamic scenarios. Guillaume Chacun, Mehdi Akeddar, Thomas Rieder, Bruno Da Rocha Carvalho, Marina Zapater |
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI | 1 |