Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jonas Kälble

dblp:377/6308 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Autonomous driving · 33% 3D vision · 33% Robot navigation and mapping · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
1.622025
EvOcc: Accurate Semantic Occupancy for Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory · CVPR 2025
Accurate Training Data for Occupancy Map Prediction in Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory · CVPR 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
occupancy grid mapping
1.622025
EvOcc: Accurate Semantic Occupancy for Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory · CVPR 2025
Accurate Training Data for Occupancy Map Prediction in Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory · CVPR 2024
Robotics › Autonomous driving › autonomous driving perception
occupancy map prediction
1.622025
EvOcc: Accurate Semantic Occupancy for Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory · CVPR 2025
Accurate Training Data for Occupancy Map Prediction in Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory · CVPR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

evidence theory · 1.6uncertainty estimation · 0.9LiDAR · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 EvOcc: Accurate Semantic Occupancy for Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory
abstract
We present EvOcc, a novel framework for evidential semantic occupancy mapping. It consists of two parts: (1) an evidential approach for calculating the ground-truth 3D semantic occupancy maps from noisy LiDAR measurements, and (2) a method for training image-based occupancy estimation models through a new loss formulation. In contrast to state-of-the-art semantic occupancy maps, our approach explicitly models the uncertainty introduced by unobserved spaces or contradicting measurements, and we show that using it results in significantly stronger models. Evaluated as ray-based mIoU, our evidential semantic occupancy mapping approach improves over the baselines by at least 15.8% for the ground truth and 5.5% for the trained model. Overall, we make a significant contribution towards more detailed and uncertainty-aware 3D environment understanding and safe operation in autonomous driving.
Jonas Kälble, Sascha Wirges, Maxim Tatarchenko, Eddy Ilg
CVPR1
2024 Accurate Training Data for Occupancy Map Prediction in Automated Driving Using Evidence Theory
abstract
Automated driving fundamentally requires knowledge about the surrounding geometry of the scene. Modern approaches use only captured images to predict occupancy maps that represent the geometry. Training these approaches requires accurate data that may be acquired with the help of LiDAR scanners. We show that the techniques used for current benchmarks and training datasets to convert LiDAR scans into occupancy grid maps yield very low quality, and subsequently present a novel approach using evidence theory that yields more accurate reconstructions. We demonstrate that these are superior by a large margin, both qualitatively and quan-titatively, and that we additionally obtain meaningful uncertainty estimates. When converting the occupancy maps back to depth estimates and comparing them with the raw LiDAR measurements, our method yields a MAE improvement of 30% to 52% on nuScenes and 53% on Waymo over other occupancy ground-truth data. Finally, we use the improved occupancy maps to train a state-of-the-art occupancy prediction method and demonstrate that it improves the MAE by 25% on nuScenes.
Jonas Kälble, Sascha Wirges, Maxim Tatarchenko, Eddy Ilg
CVPR1