Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yijin Ni

dblp:377/8442 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness criteria
equalized odds
0.912025
Kernel-based Equalized Odds: A Quantification of Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off in Fair Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.912025
Kernel-based Equalized Odds: A Quantification of Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off in Fair Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair representation learning
0.912025
Kernel-based Equalized Odds: A Quantification of Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off in Fair Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel-based formulation · 0.9concentration inequalities · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Kernel-based Equalized Odds: A Quantification of Accuracy-Fairness Trade-off in Fair Representation Learning
abstract
This paper introduces a novel kernel-based formulation of the Equalized Odds (EO) criterion, denoted as $\operatorname{EO}_k$, for fair representation learning (FRL) in supervised settings. The central goal of FRL is to mitigate discrimination regarding a sensitive attribute $S$ while preserving prediction accuracy for the target variable $Y$. Our proposed criterion enables a rigorous and interpretable quantification of three core fairness objectives: independence ($\widehat{Y} \perp S$), separation—also known as equalized odds ($\widehat{Y} \perp S \mid Y$), and calibration ($Y \perp S \mid \widehat{Y}$). Under both unbiased ($Y \perp S$) and biased ($Y \not \perp S$) conditions, we show that $\operatorname{EO}_k$ satisfies both independence and separation in the former, and uniquely preserves predictive accuracy while lower bounding independence and calibration in the latter, thereby offering a unified analytical characterization of the tradeoffs among these fairness criteria. We further define the empirical counterpart, $\widehat{\operatorname{EO}}_k$, a kernel-based statistic that can be computed in quadratic time, with linear-time approximations also available. A concentration inequality for $\widehat{\operatorname{EO}}_k$ is derived, providing performance guarantees and error bounds, which serve as practical certificates of fairness compliance. While our focus is on theoretical development, the results lay essential groundwork for principled and provably fair algorithmic design in future empirical studies.
Yijin Ni, Xiaoming Huo
NeurIPS1
2023 Simultaneous Dimension Reduction and Variable Selection for Multinomial Logistic Regression
abstract
Multinomial logistic regression is a useful model for predicting the probabilities of multiclass outcomes. Because of the complexity and high dimensionality of some data, it is challenging to fit a valid model with high accuracy and interpretability. We propose a novel sparse reduced-rank multinomial logistic regression model to jointly select variables and reduce the dimension via a nonconvex row constraint. We develop a block-wise iterative algorithm with a majorizing surrogate function to efficiently solve the optimization problem. From an algorithmic aspect, we show that the output estimator enjoys consistency in estimation and sparsity recovery even in a high-dimensional setting. The finite sample performance of the proposed method is investigated via simulation studies and two real image data sets. The results show that our proposal has competitive performance in both estimation accuracy and computation time. History: Accepted by Andrea Lodi, Area Editor for Design & Analysis of Algorithms–Discrete. Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grants 71991474, 12171449, 11801540, and 12071494] and the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province [Grant BJ2040170017]. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2022.0132 .
Canhong Wen, Zhenduo Li, Ruipeng Dong, Yijin Ni, Wenliang Pan
INFORMS J. Comput.4