Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhihan Lei

dblp:378/1180 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-2909-1489ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 91% Graph data management · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval-augmented generation
graph-based retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
CG-RAG: Research Question Answering by Citation Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
question answering
0.912025
CG-RAG: Research Question Answering by Citation Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
CG-RAG: Research Question Answering by Citation Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs · SIGIR 2025
Graph data management
citation network
0.312025
CG-RAG: Research Question Answering by Citation Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse retrieval · 0.9large language model · 0.9graph encoding · 0.9dense retrieval · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CG-RAG: Research Question Answering by Citation Graph Retrieval-Augmented LLMs
abstract
Research question answering requires accurate retrieval and contextual understanding of scientific literature. However, current Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) methods often struggle to balance complex document relationships with precise information retrieval. In this paper, we introduce Contextualized Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CG-RAG), a novel framework that integrates sparse and dense retrieval signals within graph structures to enhance retrieval efficiency and subsequently improve generation quality for research question answering. First, we propose a contextual graph representation for citation graphs, effectively capturing both explicit and implicit connections within and across documents. Next, we introduce Lexical-Semantic Graph Retrieval (LeSeGR), which seamlessly integrates sparse and dense retrieval signals with graph encoding. It bridges the gap between lexical precision and semantic understanding in citation graph retrieval, demonstrating generalizability to existing graph retrieval and hybrid retrieval methods. Finally, we present a context-aware generation strategy that utilizes the retrieved graph-structured information to generate precise and contextually enriched responses using large language models (LLMs). Extensive experiments on research question answering benchmarks across multiple domains demonstrate that our CG-RAG framework significantly outperforms RAG methods combined with various state-of-the-art retrieval approaches, delivering superior retrieval accuracy and generation quality.
Yuntong Hu, Zhihan Lei, Zhongjie Dai, Allen Zhang 0005, Abhinav Angirekula, Zheng Zhang 0047, Liang Zhao 0002
SIGIR2