WinKent Ong

dblp:378/1280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8403-8211ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 59% Trustworthy machine learning · 41%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated foundation model
0.912025
Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
privacy-preserving federated learning
0.912025
Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
federated learning privacy
0.912025
Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
feature unlearning
0.812024
Ferrari: Federated Feature Unlearning via Optimizing Feature Sensitivity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.812024
Ferrari: Federated Feature Unlearning via Optimizing Feature Sensitivity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
federated unlearning
0.812024
Ferrari: Federated Feature Unlearning via Optimizing Feature Sensitivity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
privacy
0.812024
Ferrari: Federated Feature Unlearning via Optimizing Feature Sensitivity · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
right to be forgotten
0.812024
Ferrari: Federated Feature Unlearning via Optimizing Feature Sensitivity · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

teacher-student learning · 1.7knowledge transfer · 1.7incentive mechanism design · 1.7lipschitz continuity · 0.8feature sensitivity minimization · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Maverick: Collaboration-Free Federated Unlearning for Medical Privacy
WinKent Ong, Chee Seng Chan
MICCAI (14)1
2025 Ten Challenging Problems in Federated Foundation Models
abstract
Federated Foundation Models (FedFMs) represent a distributed learning paradigm that fuses general competences of foundation models as well as privacy-preserving capabilities of federated learning. This combination allows the large foundation models and the small local domain models at the remote clients to learn from each other in a teacher-student learning setting. This paper provides a comprehensive summary of the ten challenging problems inherent in FedFMs, encompassing foundational theory, utilization of private data, continual learning, unlearning, Non-IID and graph data, bidirectional knowledge transfer, incentive mechanism design, game mechanism design, model watermarking, and efficiency. The ten challenging problems manifest in five pivotal aspects: “Foundational Theory,” which aims to establish a coherent and unifying theoretical framework for FedFMs. “Data,” addressing the difficulties in leveraging domain-specific knowledge from private data while maintaining privacy; “Heterogeneity,” examining variations in data, model, and computational resources across clients; “Security and Privacy,” focusing on defenses against malicious attacks and model theft; and “Efficiency,” highlighting the need for improvements in training, communication, and parameter efficiency. For each problem, we offer a clear mathematical definition on the objective function, analyze existing methods, and discuss the key challenges and potential solutions. This in-depth exploration aims to advance the theoretical foundations of FedFMs, guide practical implementations, and inspire future research to overcome these obstacles, thereby enabling the robust, efficient, and privacy-preserving FedFMs in various real-world applications.
Tao Fan 0002, Hanlin Gu, Xuemei Cao 0001, Chee Seng Chan, Qian Chen 0023, Yiqiang Chen 0001, Yihui Feng, Yang Gu 0001, Jiaxiang Geng, Bing Luo 0002, Shuoling Liu, WinKent Ong, Chao Ren 0006, Jiaqi Shao, Xiaoli Tang 0001, Hong Xi Tae, Yongxin Tong, Shuyue Wei 0001, Fan Wu 0006, Wei Xi 0003, Mingcong Xu, Xin Yang 0012, Jiangpeng Yan, Hao Yu 0023, Han Yu 0001, Xiaojin Zhang 0002, Zhenzhe Zheng 0001, Lixin Fan, Qiang Yang 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.12
2024 Ferrari: Federated Feature Unlearning via Optimizing Feature Sensitivity
abstract
The advent of Federated Learning (FL) highlights the practical necessity for the ’right to be forgotten’ for all clients, allowing them to request data deletion from the machine learning model’s service provider. This necessity has spurred a growing demand for Federated Unlearning (FU). Feature unlearning has gained considerable attention due to its applications in unlearning sensitive, backdoor, and biased features. Existing methods employ the influence function to achieve feature unlearning, which is impractical for FL as it necessitates the participation of other clients, if not all, in the unlearning process. Furthermore, current research lacks an evaluation of the effectiveness of feature unlearning. To address these limitations, we define feature sensitivity in evaluating feature unlearning according to Lipschitz continuity. This metric characterizes the model output’s rate of change or sensitivity to perturbations in the input feature. We then propose an effective federated feature unlearning framework called Ferrari, which minimizes feature sensitivity. Extensive experimental results and theoretical analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of Ferrari across various feature unlearning scenarios, including sensitive, backdoor, and biased features. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/OngWinKent/Federated-Feature-Unlearning
Hanlin Gu, WinKent Ong, Chee Seng Chan, Lixin Fan
NeurIPS2