EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Neel Jawale
dblp:378/1391
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot manipulation · 67% Motion planning and robot control · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot manipulation › nonprehensile manipulation
dynamic object transport |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Non-Prehensile Object Transport via Model-Predictive Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Non-Prehensile Object Transport via Model-Predictive Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
nonprehensile manipulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Dynamic Non-Prehensile Object Transport via Model-Predictive Reinforcement Learning · ICRA 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
value function ensemble · 0.9model predictive control · 0.9batch reinforcement learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Dynamic Non-Prehensile Object Transport via Model-Predictive Reinforcement LearningabstractWe investigate the problem of teaching a robot manipulator to perform dynamic non-prehensile object transport, also known as the ‘robot waiter’ task, from a limited set of real-world demonstrations. We propose an approach that combines batch reinforcement learning (RL) with modelpredictive control (MPC) by pretraining an ensemble of value functions from demonstration data, and utilizing them online within an uncertainty-aware MPC scheme to ensure robustness to limited data coverage. Our approach is straightforward to integrate with off-the-shelf MPC frameworks and enables learning solely from task space demonstrations with sparsely labeled transitions, while leveraging MPC to ensure smooth joint space motions and constraint satisfaction. We validate the proposed approach through extensive simulated and real-world experiments on a Franka Panda robot performing the robot waiter task and demonstrate robust deployment of value functions learned from 50 – 100 demonstrations. Furthermore, our approach enables generalization to novel objects not seen during training and can improve upon suboptimal demonstrations. We believe that such a framework can reduce the burden of providing extensive demonstrations and facilitate rapid training of robot manipulators to perform non-prehensile manipulation tasks. Project videos and supplementary material can be found at: https://sites.google.com/view/cvmpc Neel Jawale, Byron Boots, Balakumar Sundaralingam, Mohak Bhardwaj |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | Learned Slip-Detection-Severity Framework using Tactile Deformation Field Feedback for Robotic ManipulationabstractSafely handling objects and avoiding slippage are fundamental challenges in robotic manipulation, yet traditional techniques often oversimplify the issue by treating slippage as a binary occurrence. Our research presents a framework that both identifies slip incidents and measures their severity. We introduce a set of features based on detailed vector field analysis of tactile deformation data captured by the GelSight Mini sensor. Two distinct machine learning models use these features: one focuses on slip detection, and the other evaluates the slip’s severity, which is the slipping velocity of the object against the sensor surface. Our slip detection model achieves an average accuracy of 92%, and the slip severity estimation model exhibits a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.6 cm/s for unseen objects. To demonstrate the synergistic approach of this framework, we employ both the models in a tactile feedback-guided vertical sliding task. Leveraging the high accuracy of slip detection, we utilize it as the foundational and corrective model and integrate the slip severity estimation into the feedback control loop to address slips without overcompensating. Videos and demonstrations are available at: https://sites.google.com/uw.edu/lsds Neel Jawale, Amy Santoso, Xiaohai Hu, Xu Chen 0001 |
IROS | 1 |