Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yousef Yassin
dblp:378/1799
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-7290-9167ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 54% Image recognition and object detection · 19% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 62% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 38% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025 LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and Extrapolate · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
adaptive computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › visual recognition
high-resolution image recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › dense subgraph discovery
densest subgraph |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Corporate Needs You to Find the Difference: Revisiting Submodular and Supermodular Ratio Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Corporate Needs You to Find the Difference: Revisiting Submodular and Supermodular Ratio Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and Extrapolate · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
selective attention |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and Extrapolate · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-Supervision · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Corporate Needs You to Find the Difference: Revisiting Submodular and Supermodular Ratio Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › norm optimization
minimum norm problem |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Corporate Needs You to Find the Difference: Revisiting Submodular and Supermodular Ratio Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and Extrapolate · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and Extrapolate · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
supergreedy++ · 0.9self-supervised distillation · 0.9minimum norm point · 0.9low-resolution selector · 0.9high-resolution extractor · 0.9fujishige-wolfe algorithm · 0.9translation equivariance · 0.82d attention masks · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LookWhere? Efficient Visual Recognition by Learning Where to Look and What to See from Self-SupervisionabstractVision transformers are ever larger, more accurate, and more expensive to compute.
At high resolution, the expense is even more extreme as the number of tokens grows quadratically in the image size.
We turn to adaptive computation to cope with this cost by learning to predict where to compute.
Our LookWhere method divides the computation between a low-resolution selector and a high-resolution extractor without ever processing the full high-resolution input.
We jointly pretrain the selector and extractor without task supervision by distillation from a self-supervised teacher, in effect learning where and what to compute at the same time.
Unlike prior token reduction methods, which pay to save by pruning already-computed tokens, and prior token selection methods, which
require complex and expensive per-task optimization, LookWhere economically and accurately selects and extracts transferrable representations of images.
We show that LookWhere excels at sparse recognition on high-resolution inputs (Traffic Signs), maintaining accuracy while reducing FLOPs by 17x and time by 4x, and standard recognition tasks that are global (ImageNet classification) and local (ADE20K segmentation), improving accuracy while reducing time by 1.36x. Anthony Fuller, Yousef Yassin, Junfeng Wen, Tarek Ibrahim, Daniel G. Kyrollos, James R. Green, Evan Shelhamer |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Corporate Needs You to Find the Difference: Revisiting Submodular and Supermodular Ratio Optimization ProblemsabstractWe consider the following question: given a submodular or supermodular set function $f:2^V \to \mathbb{R}$, how should one minimize or maximize its average value $f(S)/|S|$ over non-empty subsets $S\subseteq V$? This problem generalizes several well-known objectives including Densest Subgraph (DSG), Densest Supermodular Set (DSS), and Submodular Function Minimization (SFM). Motivated by recent applications [39, 31], we formalize two new broad problems: the Unrestricted Sparsest Submodular Set (USSS) and Unrestricted Densest Supermodular Set (UDSS) which allow negative and non-monotone functions.
Using classical results we observe that DSS, SFM, USSS, UDSS, and MNP are all equivalent under strongly polynomial-time reductions. This equivalence enables algorithmic cross-over: methods designed for one problem can be repurposed to solve others efficiently. In particular we use the perspective of the minimum norm point in the base polyhedron of a sub/supermodular function which, via Fujishige's results, yields the dense decomposition as a byproduct. Via this perspective we show that a recent converging heuristic for DSS, \textsc{SuperGreedy++} [15, 29], and Wolfe’s minimum norm point algorithm are both universal solvers for all of these problems.
On the theoretical front, we explain the observation made in recent work [39, 31] that \textsc{SuperGreedy++} appears to work well even in settings beyond DSS. Surprisingly, we also show that this simple algorithm can be used for Submodular Function Minimization, including for example that it can act as an effective minimum $st$ cut algorithm.
On the empirical front, we explore the utility of several different algorithms including Fujishige-Wolfe min-norm point algorithm for recent problems. We conduct over 400 experiments across seven problem types and large-scale synthetic and real-world datasets (up to $\approx 100$ million edges). Our results reveal that methods historically considered inefficient, such as convex-programming methods, flow-based solvers, and Fujishige-Wolfe’s algorithm, outperform state-of-the-art task-specific baselines by orders of magnitude on concrete problems like HNSN [39]. These findings challenge prevailing assumptions and demonstrate that with the right framing, general optimization algorithms can be both scalable and state-of-the-art for supermodular and submodular ratio problems. Elfarouk Harb, Yousef Yassin, Chandra Chekuri |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2025 | Soft Contrastive Representation Learning for Cloud-Particle Images Captured In-Flight by the New HVPS-4 Airborne ProbeabstractCloud properties underpin accurate climate modeling and are often derived from the individual particles comprising a cloud. Studying these cloud particles is challenging due to their intricate shapes, called “habits,” and manual classification via probe-generated images is time-consuming and subjective. We propose a novel method for habit representation learning that uses minimal labeled data by leveraging self-supervised learning (SSL) with Vision Transformers (ViTs) on a newly acquired dataset of 124000 images captured by the novel high-volume precipitation spectrometer ver. 4 (HVPS-4) probe. Our approach significantly outperforms ImageNet pretraining by 48% on a 293-sample annotated dataset. Notably, we present the first SSL scheme for learning habit representations, leveraging data collected in flight from the probe. Our results demonstrate that self-supervised pretraining significantly improves habit classification even when using single-channel HVPS-4 data. We achieve further gains using sequential views and a soft contrastive objective tailored for sequential, in-flight measurements. Our work paves the way for applying SSL to multiview and multiscale data from advanced cloud-particle imaging probes, enabling comprehensive characterization of the flight environment. We publicly release data, code, and models associated with this study. Yousef Yassin, Anthony Fuller, Keyvan Ranjbar, Kenny Bala, Leonid Nichman, James R. Green |
IEEE Geosci. Remote. Sens. Lett. | 1 |
| 2024 | LookHere: Vision Transformers with Directed Attention Generalize and ExtrapolateabstractHigh-resolution images offer more information about scenes that can improve model accuracy. However, the dominant model architecture in computer vision, the vision transformer (ViT), cannot effectively leverage larger images without finetuning — ViTs poorly extrapolate to more patches at test time, although transformers offer sequence length flexibility. We attribute this shortcoming to the current patch position encoding methods, which create a distribution shift when extrapolating.
We propose a drop-in replacement for the position encoding of plain ViTs that restricts attention heads to fixed fields of view, pointed in different directions, using 2D attention masks. Our novel method, called LookHere, provides translation-equivariance, ensures attention head diversity, and limits the distribution shift that attention heads face when extrapolating. We demonstrate that LookHere improves performance on classification (avg. 1.6%), against adversarial attack (avg. 5.4%), and decreases calibration error (avg. 1.5%) — on ImageNet without extrapolation. With extrapolation, LookHere outperforms the current SoTA position encoding method, 2D-RoPE, by 21.7% on ImageNet when trained at $224^2$ px and tested at $1024^2$ px. Additionally, we release a high-resolution test set to improve the evaluation of high-resolution image classifiers, called ImageNet-HR. Anthony Fuller, Daniel G. Kyrollos, Yousef Yassin, James R. Green |
NeurIPS | 3 |