Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nyamdavaa Amar
dblp:378/2345
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 75% Distributed systems · 25% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning
distributed training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable Memory · NeurIPS 2024 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable Memory · NeurIPS 2024 |
Parallel and multicore computing
pipeline parallelism |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable Memory · NeurIPS 2024 |
Parallel and multicore computing › task scheduling
pipeline scheduling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable Memory · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › large model training
distributed training of large language models |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable Memory · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
building block decomposition · 1.5activation memory control · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Pipeline Parallelism with Controllable MemoryabstractPipeline parallelism has been widely explored, but most existing schedules lack a systematic methodology. In this paper, we propose a framework to decompose pipeline schedules as repeating a building block, and show that the lifespan of the building block decides the peak activation memory of the pipeline schedule. Guided by the observations, we find that almost all existing pipeline schedules, to the best of our knowledge, are memory inefficient. To address this, we introduce a family of memory efficient building blocks with controllable activation memory, which can reduce the peak activation memory to 1/2 of 1F1B without sacrificing efficiency, and even to 1/3 with comparable throughput. We can also achieve almost zero pipeline bubbles while maintaining the same activation memory as 1F1B. Our evaluations demonstrate that in pure pipeline parallelism settings, our methods outperform 1F1B by from 7\% to 55\% in terms of throughput. When employing a grid search over hybrid parallelism hyperparameters in practical scenarios, our methods demonstrate a 16\% throughput improvement over the 1F1B baseline for large language models. The implementation is open-sourced at https://github.com/sail-sg/zero-bubble-pipeline-parallelism. Penghui Qi, Nyamdavaa Amar |
NeurIPS | 3 |