Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Germain Vivier-Ardisson
dblp:378/5356
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Generative modeling · 33% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
structured prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 1.5structured prediction · 1.5first-order optimization · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured PredictionabstractOptimization layers in deep neural networks have enjoyed a growing popularity in structured learning, improving the state of the art on a variety of applications. Yet, these pipelines lack interpretability since they are made of two opaque layers: a highly non-linear prediction model, such as a deep neural network, and an optimization layer, which is typically a complex black-box solver. Our goal is to improve the transparency of such methods by providing counterfactual explanations. We build upon variational autoencoders a principled way of obtaining counterfactuals: working in the latent space leads to a natural notion of plausibility of explanations. We finally introduce a variant of the classic loss for VAE training that improves their performance in our specific structured context. These provide the foundations of CF-OPT, a first-order optimization algorithm that can find counterfactual explanations for a broad class of structured learning architectures. Our numerical results show that both close and plausible explanations can be obtained for problems from the recent literature. Germain Vivier-Ardisson, Alexandre Forel, Axel Parmentier, Thibaut Vidal |
ICML | 1 |