Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Germain Vivier-Ardisson

dblp:378/5356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Generative modeling · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
counterfactual explanation
0.812024
CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.812024
CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024
Algorithms and data structures › learning algorithms
structured prediction
0.212024
CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction · ICML 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational autoencoder · 1.5structured prediction · 1.5first-order optimization · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 CF-OPT: Counterfactual Explanations for Structured Prediction
abstract
Optimization layers in deep neural networks have enjoyed a growing popularity in structured learning, improving the state of the art on a variety of applications. Yet, these pipelines lack interpretability since they are made of two opaque layers: a highly non-linear prediction model, such as a deep neural network, and an optimization layer, which is typically a complex black-box solver. Our goal is to improve the transparency of such methods by providing counterfactual explanations. We build upon variational autoencoders a principled way of obtaining counterfactuals: working in the latent space leads to a natural notion of plausibility of explanations. We finally introduce a variant of the classic loss for VAE training that improves their performance in our specific structured context. These provide the foundations of CF-OPT, a first-order optimization algorithm that can find counterfactual explanations for a broad class of structured learning architectures. Our numerical results show that both close and plausible explanations can be obtained for problems from the recent literature.
Germain Vivier-Ardisson, Alexandre Forel, Axel Parmentier, Thibaut Vidal
ICML1