Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vlatka Tolj

dblp:378/5565 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-5933-5592ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › robot ethics
robot abuse
1.012026
Sympathy as a Lens for Human-Robot Interaction: Analysing YouTube Responses to Robot Abuse · HRI 2026
Collaborative and social computing
sentiment analysis
0.312026
Sympathy as a Lens for Human-Robot Interaction: Analysing YouTube Responses to Robot Abuse · HRI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sentiment analysis · 1.0large language model · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Sympathy as a Lens for Human-Robot Interaction: Analysing YouTube Responses to Robot Abuse
abstract
When witnessing the abuse of others, humans generally exhibit emotional responses. A large number of studies in Human-Robot-Interaction (HRI) have shown that humans also react with sympathy when robots are abused, but most of these insights come from controlled laboratory studies using short videos and student samples. To complement existing research with observations drawn from real-world online discussions, this paper presents a sentiment analysis of 103,413 YouTube comments on videos depicting abuse of animal-like, humanoid, and cart-shaped robots. To validate our sentiment classification, we analysed the comments using a lexicon-based tool, two fine-tuned language models, and three general-purpose state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). The comparison yielded interesting results: LLMs generally classified science-fiction–related comments, e.g., references to dystopian TV shows, as negative, while lexicon and fine-tuned models mainly labelled them as neutral. The six models agreed on the classification of a total of 27,427 comments, which we used to explore the sentiment expressions occurring across videos featuring robots with different physical forms. Our findings provide large-scale, ecologically valid insights into how emotional responses to robot abuse are expressed and analysed in online video platforms.
Vlatka Tolj, Caterina Neef, Barbara Bruno
HRI1