Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vlatka Tolj
dblp:378/5565
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-5933-5592ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › robot ethics
robot abuse |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Sympathy as a Lens for Human-Robot Interaction: Analysing YouTube Responses to Robot Abuse · HRI 2026 |
Collaborative and social computing
sentiment analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Sympathy as a Lens for Human-Robot Interaction: Analysing YouTube Responses to Robot Abuse · HRI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sentiment analysis · 1.0large language model · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Sympathy as a Lens for Human-Robot Interaction: Analysing YouTube Responses to Robot AbuseabstractWhen witnessing the abuse of others, humans generally exhibit emotional responses. A large number of studies in Human-Robot-Interaction (HRI) have shown that humans also react with sympathy when robots are abused, but most of these insights come from controlled laboratory studies using short videos and student samples. To complement existing research with observations drawn from real-world online discussions, this paper presents a sentiment analysis of 103,413 YouTube comments on videos depicting abuse of animal-like, humanoid, and cart-shaped robots. To validate our sentiment classification, we analysed the comments using a lexicon-based tool, two fine-tuned language models, and three general-purpose state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs). The comparison yielded interesting results: LLMs generally classified science-fiction–related comments, e.g., references to dystopian TV shows, as negative, while lexicon and fine-tuned models mainly labelled them as neutral. The six models agreed on the classification of a total of 27,427 comments, which we used to explore the sentiment expressions occurring across videos featuring robots with different physical forms. Our findings provide large-scale, ecologically valid insights into how emotional responses to robot abuse are expressed and analysed in online video platforms. Vlatka Tolj, Caterina Neef, Barbara Bruno |
HRI | 1 |