Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Schmitt-Förster
dblp:378/5588
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 80% Learning theory · 20% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous state-action spaces |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Regularized Q-learning through Robust Averaging · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spaces · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scenario approach · 0.8robust averaging · 0.8occupation measures · 0.8linear programming · 0.8distributionally robust estimation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Regularized Q-learning through Robust AveragingabstractWe propose a new Q-learning variant, called 2RA Q-learning, that addresses some weaknesses of existing Q-learning methods in a principled manner. One such weakness is an underlying estimation bias which cannot be controlled and often results in poor performance. We propose a distributionally robust estimator for the maximum expected value term, which allows us to precisely control the level of estimation bias introduced. The distributionally robust estimator admits a closed-form solution such that the proposed algorithm has a computational cost per iteration comparable to Watkins' Q-learning. For the tabular case, we show that 2RA Q-learning converges to the optimal policy and analyze its asymptotic mean-squared error. Lastly, we conduct numerical experiments for various settings, which corroborate our theoretical findings and indicate that 2RA Q-learning often performs better than existing methods. Peter Schmitt-Förster, Tobias Sutter |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Randomized algorithms and PAC bounds for inverse reinforcement learning in continuous spacesabstractThis work studies discrete-time discounted Markov decision processes with continuous state and action spaces and addresses the inverse problem of inferring a cost function from observed optimal behavior. We first consider the case in which we have access to the entire expert policy and characterize the set of solutions to the inverse problem by using occupation measures, linear duality, and complementary slackness conditions. To avoid trivial solutions and ill-posedness, we introduce a natural linear normalization constraint. This results in an infinite-dimensional linear feasibility problem, prompting a thorough analysis of its properties. Next, we use linear function approximators and adopt a randomized approach, namely the scenario approach and related probabilistic feasibility guarantees, to derive $\varepsilon$-optimal solutions for the inverse problem. We further discuss the sample complexity for a desired approximation accuracy. Finally, we deal with the more realistic case where we only have access to a finite set of expert demonstrations and a generative model and provide bounds on the error made when working with samples. Angeliki Kamoutsi, Peter Schmitt-Förster, Tobias Sutter, Volkan Cevher, John Lygeros |
NeurIPS | 2 |